Who Owns the Rights to Our Germs?

Each of us have more microbes on and in our bodies than we have cells of our own. Some are beneficial; others we'd like to do without. Then there are millions that are neither, but may be profitable someday. Sound ridiculous? Consider this scenario:
IMAGINE a scientist gently swabs your left nostril with a Q-tip and finds that your nose contains hundreds of species of bacteria. That in itself is no surprise; each of us is home to some 100 trillion microbes. But then she makes an interesting discovery: in your nose is a previously unknown species that produces a powerful new antibiotic. Her university licenses it to a pharmaceutical company; it hits the market and earns hundreds of millions of dollars. Do you deserve a cut of the profits?

It is a tricky question, because it defies our traditional notions of property and justice. You were not born with the germ in your nose; at some point in your life, it infected you. On the other hand, that microbe may be able to grow and reproduce only in a human nose. You provided it with an essential shelter. And its antibiotics may help keep you healthy, by killing disease-causing germs that attempt to invade your nose.

Bioethicists are wrangling with the notion of microbe ownership. Carl Zimmer, whose navel microbes have already been posted at Neatorama, writes about the issues involved at the New York Times. Link -via The Loom

Comments (4)

Newest 4
Newest 4 Comments

And shortly after you win the case to say you own the germ you're charged with murder because someone you sneezed on dies.

I think it would all be better if germs & microbes were public domain and all profits from the sale of anything made from them went into further research & development.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
It seems to be a mater between me, and the scientist with Q-tip. There is some sort of consent agreement to at least hold still while they stick a Q-tip up my nose.

The scientist should have some sort of contract saying they will contact you if they find anything noteworthy while, what they pull off the q-tip belongs to the experiment.

Then at most they would name the antibody after the scientist who found it, not after me who was growing it.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Sad world.
Help Thy Neighbor?
These days we only help our neighbor if we can make a profit.

- Hey we got a cure that can save millions of lives!
- OK so how do we do this so that we can make as much money as possible?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
A find example of someone trying to hard to be an "artist"

If putting out pop songs and strange rock works for your fans...... stick to the straight and narrow and give them what they want. Why try to reinvent the recipe of your success?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Revolution #9 at first was scary, then revolutionary. This may be one of the most important songs of my life. It tore open the POP music fabric exposing a musical landscape undreamed of before by my 11 year old mind. After Revolution #9 I heard the possibility of music everywhere. I wanted more, I searched out and found John Cage, La Monte Young and later musicians like Eno and other Prog and boundary dissolving music. My adult musical life was directly informed by this Beatle experiment.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I remember hearing "Revolution #9" for the first time in 1969 and being totally confused by it. For the time it was certainly unusual...as to whether or not it's "the Beatles song everyone hates", I really hate "Fool On The Hill" and find "Revolution #9" merely underwhelming.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Since I was 13, I've always thought this was one of their greatest pieces of work.
Then again: I hate songs like "Michelle", "Hey Jude" and "Let It Be". Maybe I was really dropped off by aliens? Number 9, number 9, number 9, number 9, number 9, ....
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
My favorite moment on my favorite Beatles album. And the whole world may not be making this kind of music, he did manage to predict an entire genre of music—several actually, but lets focus on one: plunderphonics (Google it).
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Well, not the response Miss Celliana (or Eddie Deezen?) expected judging by the bent of her/his piece. Apparently Revolution #9 is far more popular/appreciated than she/he realized. So, I'm not sure where the author got their information, as it seems to fly in the face of every single comment here.

For my 2 cents, I can't think of a single Lennon song I dislike, whereas there are at least a few McCartney songs I can easily do without, and I think that's probably true for most people. That being said, I have to wonder if the "overall least popular Beatles song" isn't in actuality a McCartney-penned song.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
  2 replies
Login to comment.
Email This Post to a Friend
"Who Owns the Rights to Our Germs?"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More