IMAGINE a scientist gently swabs your left nostril with a Q-tip and finds that your nose contains hundreds of species of bacteria. That in itself is no surprise; each of us is home to some 100 trillion microbes. But then she makes an interesting discovery: in your nose is a previously unknown species that produces a powerful new antibiotic. Her university licenses it to a pharmaceutical company; it hits the market and earns hundreds of millions of dollars. Do you deserve a cut of the profits?
It is a tricky question, because it defies our traditional notions of property and justice. You were not born with the germ in your nose; at some point in your life, it infected you. On the other hand, that microbe may be able to grow and reproduce only in a human nose. You provided it with an essential shelter. And its antibiotics may help keep you healthy, by killing disease-causing germs that attempt to invade your nose.
Bioethicists are wrangling with the notion of microbe ownership. Carl Zimmer, whose navel microbes have already been posted at Neatorama, writes about the issues involved at the New York Times. Link -via The Loom
Help Thy Neighbor?
These days we only help our neighbor if we can make a profit.
- Hey we got a cure that can save millions of lives!
- OK so how do we do this so that we can make as much money as possible?
The scientist should have some sort of contract saying they will contact you if they find anything noteworthy while, what they pull off the q-tip belongs to the experiment.
Then at most they would name the antibody after the scientist who found it, not after me who was growing it.
I think it would all be better if germs & microbes were public domain and all profits from the sale of anything made from them went into further research & development.
Any woman close enough to transfer them.