While there are some 'surprises' today, it's just too predictable and too unbelievable at times. Yes, you know it's fixed, but there has to be some level of rationality to it. When you have a guy they are building up versus a nobody, you already know the outcome so it's not watchable. When you have two well known opponents and one is a foot shorter and 100 pounds less, it's difficult to suspend belief when you have the little guy win, it's unwatchable. The longer matches today follow the same predictable 1 count, then 2 count, then pin formula, it's easy to predict a winner. The problem is all of these devices are used literally every week. I personally enjoy wrestling, but the amount of product that's watchable can be DVR'd and watched in 30 minutes. They need the personality to mask the predictability and lack of rationality. Yet most don't have that nor storylines that build more than two weeks so one is interested in watching. While the 'Atlas Obscura' article seems to imply actual wrestling was boring, I think it would be novel to not be able to figure out the winner before it happens. But then I suppose you couldn't time shows precisely and 'build storylines'.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)