I saw. Sorry if I wasn't clear, but I was more objecting to the headline than the content of the story. I think that Boing Boing's coverage was frankly more informative and accurate. I wouldn't say that an animal that's been in the process of being studied and identified for nearly five years is "new." In my opinion (so take with as many grains of salt as you like) this is akin to "Columbus Discovered New Continent." It's misleading and more than that not true.