Chris Houser's Comments
You know what? I was thinking about it, and let's just skip all this process and get to what we all really want, bringing back slavery.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
I see the error of my ways. Maybe you're right. In fact, the minimum wage law itself is absurd. As you said, anyone can sell hotdogs. We should just drop minimum wage and let hotdog sellers compete for the lowest payright! Maybe we can even get them down to 2 dollars an hour. It'll be great for the economy!
As a bonus, this would provide the owners with that much extra cash to pay players with. You might be onto something, we could show baseball players their true value by letting everyone compete for their wages! Bottom of the barrel be damned! Regulation was a stupid idea to begin with.
As a bonus, this would provide the owners with that much extra cash to pay players with. You might be onto something, we could show baseball players their true value by letting everyone compete for their wages! Bottom of the barrel be damned! Regulation was a stupid idea to begin with.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Isn't that the whole argument for why we should keep a free market? It's supposed to fairly distribute pay based on the value that the service brings to society. Invisible hand and everything. All it makes me see is that we should probably implement a few more of Socialism's ideas.
Think of how many underpaid workers it takes for these things to happen that are trying to support others. To keep the stadiums going and to keep the shows running to continue pulling in a profit for everyone that's making absurd amounts of money off this. If it were efficient, the distribution of income would more appropriately reflect the value gained by society. Companies are able to make lots of profit off of those with low income, leaving more room to pay these million dollar salaries to players. Classism sure is awesome.
Think of how many underpaid workers it takes for these things to happen that are trying to support others. To keep the stadiums going and to keep the shows running to continue pulling in a profit for everyone that's making absurd amounts of money off this. If it were efficient, the distribution of income would more appropriately reflect the value gained by society. Companies are able to make lots of profit off of those with low income, leaving more room to pay these million dollar salaries to players. Classism sure is awesome.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
It's a Ford.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Baseball players don't provide millions of dollars of benefit to society, though. The free market is pretty inefficient at times.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
I don't like McDonalds, but this actually looks tasty.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
They look startlingly like groucho glasses. Groucho Marx played a pretty promiscuous character. He didn't have a fake nose.. but still. The potential is there for a connection.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
My understanding of the rules of operation are that they're based on weight, with multiplication and division getting equal weight. Just as addition and subtraction get equal weight (those those are commutative so it doesn't matter the order, if there was one). Outside of that, the order of operations happens linearly. I say that the answer is 9 because if you follow from front to back, that's what you get. Arguing over whether multiplication or division takes precedence is silly, I think, because the two are of equal weight. And as is mentioned, schools teach different conventions that are a little bit too simplistic by giving everything its own tier. So, grouping multiplication and division into the same tier (the blasphemy!) and following linearly to the right as is the custom, with respect to parenthesis, we get:
6/2(1+2)
6/2(3)
3(3)
9
6/2(1+2)
6/2(3)
3(3)
9
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
It actually had a pretty good plot surrounding the value of his religion. Tony Jaa has some impressive scenes, such as a, I think, 7 minute continuous fight scene. No cuts. That's right, no cuts, no camera angle changes, no wires.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Ah, yeah. But I swear, this looks like something from an intro to some old cheesy show.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Leftover frosting? I think I want to lick the frosting that was used. ;D
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Ice cream cone holder.
Daddy's Home, Small.
Daddy's Home, Small.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Oh, Please. If Apple had invented it then Joy of Tech would be all over it. Sure, it's funny, but it's hard not to hate the overt bias of this comic.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
The entire point of this is that the free market needs regulation to keep efficiency going and to give a larger percentage of the populace spending power, which is another form of voting, mind you. The bottom of the rung jobs are what ultimately make it possible to have the absurd payscales that we commonly associate with CEOs and athletes. Forcing these employers to spend more money on their low level employees isn't going to affect the top end in any more ways except their take-home earnings. All employers would be forced to do it, so they'd all take the same cut to their top end, and the competition suffers just the same. For every 20% cut one team must take, the other teams must take as the regulation laws are universal.
So, what I'm trying to sum up here in detail for you is that the only reason we can pay these people these high wages, is because they're profiting so absurdly from the bottom because of our relatively low minimum wage laws. Low Minimum Wage = High Player Salaries. The market does not provide proper value to these people and proper value must be regulated through extra laws, such as our minimum wage law and tax laws. The invisible hand, for all intents and purposes, is mentally handicapped.