Of course it can be done badly but if you have seen the recent post on Neatorama of colorized iconic photos (Churchill, Lincoln) then you know it can be done extremely well. Why were these shot it b&w? Because the color processes at the time were either horribly expensive or poor quality. It wasn't an artistic decision, they would have done them in color if it was possible. My complaint is when the process compromises quality.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)