tabernac people's Comments
DVD condo tower from the Jetsons.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
The image of the stag in Andy's paintings are a hommage to master of this style, Gerhard Richter. It was something special in the 60's. Now reverse blurring would be something truly innovative!
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
It's an aquatic tool for recalibrating shark fins.
I would like a medium slice of Pi (Mmm), please.
I would like a medium slice of Pi (Mmm), please.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
It was supposed to be a joke...
Seriously, *****
Seriously, *****
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
This could be very popular in prisons.
Just sayin
Just sayin
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
If you have a neighbor, you can pretty much skip the first ingredient.
It also cuts down the prep time by a few billion years.
It also cuts down the prep time by a few billion years.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Natey, radio is not free for the broadcast station. Just like paying for an ISP the radio station pays royalties for their content.
What is the difference between a radio or computer that can tune into an unprotected broadcast, such as a radio station or open wifi?
Is using my neighbors porch light to read stealing his light?
To steal is to take something without the intention to return it. Its not stealing unless the person using the wifi has no intention of every giving back the borrowed band with.
That is also why there are no laws against it, because it is not stealing.
If someone feels otherwise they should secure their wifi and petition the government to actually define open wifi as illegal.
If there is an option to password protect/close the wifi and this is not done, the general internet industry standard is to assume it is fair game.
Which it is according to my understanding of the law.
http://www.cybertelecom.org/broadband/wifisecurity.htm
What is the difference between a radio or computer that can tune into an unprotected broadcast, such as a radio station or open wifi?
Is using my neighbors porch light to read stealing his light?
To steal is to take something without the intention to return it. Its not stealing unless the person using the wifi has no intention of every giving back the borrowed band with.
That is also why there are no laws against it, because it is not stealing.
If someone feels otherwise they should secure their wifi and petition the government to actually define open wifi as illegal.
If there is an option to password protect/close the wifi and this is not done, the general internet industry standard is to assume it is fair game.
Which it is according to my understanding of the law.
http://www.cybertelecom.org/broadband/wifisecurity.htm
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Am I stealing cable when I look into a store window from the side walk and see a big tv showing movies?
If you are broadcasting an open connection into a public space, or even my residence, who owns them then?
Is it trespassing to have your network in my home?
When I view a webpage on my computer screen, the browser has placed copyrighted material on my computer from the internet service provider. Who did the actual stealing?
Its such a gray area, its easier understood by the intent rather than black and white / right or wrong.
If the intent is to have a secure network, then it should not be accessible from a public space or my couch. If you dont want to be responsible for what other people download then password protect the wi-fi.
If it was fundamentally stealing and illegal then the isp and wireless hardware companies should not allow anyone to connect to the internet without the use of a password.
Everyone should read their isp service agreement.
If you are broadcasting an open connection into a public space, or even my residence, who owns them then?
Is it trespassing to have your network in my home?
When I view a webpage on my computer screen, the browser has placed copyrighted material on my computer from the internet service provider. Who did the actual stealing?
Its such a gray area, its easier understood by the intent rather than black and white / right or wrong.
If the intent is to have a secure network, then it should not be accessible from a public space or my couch. If you dont want to be responsible for what other people download then password protect the wi-fi.
If it was fundamentally stealing and illegal then the isp and wireless hardware companies should not allow anyone to connect to the internet without the use of a password.
Everyone should read their isp service agreement.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
And Voilà!, the google street view:
http://g.co/maps/rt9ba