And I'll call out "unraveled"; "To undo or ravel the entangled, knitted, or woven threads of: 'unraveled the sweater'." [The Free Dictionary] "Unveiled" would have kind of worked, "revealed" would have been good, and the original article's "uncovered" was fine.
That doesn't address why there's a "[sic]" after "Narwhal's". As far as I know, that's the correct possessive construction for the given sentence. It's not in the original article, so I'm wondering why Franzified noted it, whether I'm wrong about "Narwhal's" being correct here.
I'm curious why you put "[sic]" after "Narwhal's". That's normally used to indicate an error in the original material being quoted, but isn't "Narwhal's" is the correct possessive form for this usage?
Unfortunately, broadcast signals fade into the cosmic background in about 2 lightyears. One reason looking for random signals from other planets is pointless.
"Unveiled" would have kind of worked, "revealed" would have been good, and the original article's "uncovered" was fine.
Not to mention my Someheimer's! I can't even remember for five seconds what I said?
Next time!
It's specifically an Olive Pitter.
Schrod. Cat Wanted Dead or Alive, Men's Xl, please.