I have to agree with the purists, from the evidence (see http://symbollix.com/main.html ) for this reverse graffitti it is definetely not art nor is it created by artists.
It is clearly for marketing purposes; and as Bill Hicks puts it so eloquently, 'they can all suck a tail pipe.'
You can't be an artist of much integrity and make a living out it, if you can then you are making entertainment, not art. The masses and the affluent don't support art or creativity of much consequence or depth.
It is not hard to understand, money is not interchangeable for inspiration or personal creativity. It is worse than buying affection, or selling hate. In art's case one destroys the essence of the other.
It is clearly for marketing purposes; and as Bill Hicks puts it so eloquently, 'they can all suck a tail pipe.'
You can't be an artist of much integrity and make a living out it, if you can then you are making entertainment, not art. The masses and the affluent don't support art or creativity of much consequence or depth.
It is not hard to understand, money is not interchangeable for inspiration or personal creativity. It is worse than buying affection, or selling hate. In art's case one destroys the essence of the other.