OK, Im not saying OJ did'nt do it, but I am gonna say aftre researching the case for a class I have found there is a hole lot of resonable doupt. Ok, first off One of the prosecutions main points was the cut on OJ's hand, the pilot of the plane flying OJ to Chicago(after the murders) testified that he did not notice a cut on either of OJ's hands. Sencond of all if OJ was wearing the famous leather gloves, and did cut his hand withc the pilot missed, then why is there not a hole in the gloves? There are many other holes in this trial, for example the limo driver testified saying he did not see a bronco at OJ's house, now OJ and A.C both had white broncos,almost replicas in looks. And with A.C also being a former football player, a lineman at that would have also been a tall, 200 pound plus man. Now how does the limo driver know that it was OJ that he saw pull up in the bronco, could it have been A.C? Could OJ have realy over slept and when A.C came into the house woken up? Is all this wrong am, or am I the only one who has seen this.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)