I would like to contend the content in the article about John Morrissey many historians say that when John fought Poole he was losing and Poole's men jumped in to take the win. Poole was actually the dirty fighter. Not to mention he was far from a boxing loser he's in the International boxing hall of fame and was a champion. I feel that calling him a "boxing loser" is a bit disrespectful.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)