> Yes, so why does it also need an anatomically incorrect, human like penis and scrotum?
I believe the inclusion of said equipment (anatomically correct or otherwise) is more true to the specific artistic style chosen for the lion. If you look up images of Medieval heraldry, you'll find that a lot of critters have been rendered with their "junk" in view, some of which is also anatomically incorrect. The reason for including genitalia in heraldic designs is anyone's guess, but I suppose my point is that the artist who made the original lion for The Nordic Battlegroup was likely trying to keep with the style of art that was chosen for reference.
I believe the inclusion of said equipment (anatomically correct or otherwise) is more true to the specific artistic style chosen for the lion. If you look up images of Medieval heraldry, you'll find that a lot of critters have been rendered with their "junk" in view, some of which is also anatomically incorrect. The reason for including genitalia in heraldic designs is anyone's guess, but I suppose my point is that the artist who made the original lion for The Nordic Battlegroup was likely trying to keep with the style of art that was chosen for reference.