Except that communists didn't kill 'in the name of atheism', but in the name of communism and its authoritarian leaders. Nobody ever ran into battle with the cry 'because god doesn't exist!'. Atheism is a stance of one particular claim, that of whether a god exists or not--it's not an ideology.

And why is it you can't point out that a particular piece of evidence doesn't actually support a religious claim, without getting accused of hating religion?

So it's intolerant to point out that the actual evidence doesn't in any way support the claim being made in the title? Gosh, is the Spiderman fallacy now unassailable as well?

I call bs on 'finding would refute ethical geological timetables and even evolution'. Even if they do exist, they don't call evolution into question any more than coelacanths or crocodiles do (although several creationist websites claim those do as well).