I thought the early US astronauts already accidentally discovered their own cure for motionsickness: Getting drunk on a regular basis. Kind of tones up your ability to handle disorientation. Party on, Space Captain!
Wow! Looks like some good range of motion exercises. I've done some of them in the past to address work-related stiffness in the joints and muscles. They work.
Brilliant parents! That's the age when kids tend to wonder about the flatness of a butter knife blade and the similar shape of electrical sockets. Camera's are the perfect developmental distraction.
Doggo smile that big makes me wonder if doggo likes the N2O as much as the whipped cream--as in, "'Me smiling on my side and sliding about' means "I want whipped cream."
Some kind of a swaging tool. However, I suspect it's to flare the tip of a bolt or stud head so the nut can't back out. Just whack the mushroom head, and the cone point flares the tip of the threaded part. If you were joining girders in your skyscraper, you'd want to know the wind-flexing of your building won't back out or otherwise loosen your joints.
Y'alls need to think a little more broadly--as in beyond your own sphere of consumption. It's clear that your priorities are all about "your" money--versus realizing that money is not infinite and does come from somewhere, is extracted from elsewhere. Hoarding money to no fruitful end is harmful to a capital economy. Reinvestment is critical. However, a problem occurs when liquidity dries up from the market because of excessive concentrations of "wealth." It's kind of like the ancient story of the knight who has to kill the dragon keeping the virgin prisoner and the gold and jewels locked away. Liquidity kept out of circulation ultimately harms a economic system that relies upon demand, investment, and re-investment. The moment uncertainty occurs, the whole system locks up: Capital ceases to move. In other words, too much concentration of capital with too few results in a seizing up of the economy. That's called income inequality. Hoarding is bad; flow is good.
Y'alls need to think a little more broadly--as in beyond your own sphere of consumption. It's clear that your priorities are all about "your" money--versus realizing that money is not infinite and does come from somewhere, is extracted from elsewhere. Hoarding money to no fruitful end is harmful to a capital economy. Reinvestment is critical. However, a problem occurs when liquidity dries up from the market because of excessive concentrations of "wealth." It's kind of like the ancient story of the knight who has to kill the dragon keeping the virgin prisoner and the gold and jewels locked away. Liquidity kept out of circulation ultimately harms a economic system that relies upon demand, investment, and re-investment. The moment uncertainty occurs, the whole system locks up: Capital ceases to move. In other words, too much concentration of capital with too few results in a seizing up of the economy. That's called income inequality. Hoarding is bad; flow is good.