Ryan S's Comments

My answer was lim->0 but I see that this answer has already been given.

We have to think of "contact" in the everyday sense and assume that the antagonism of the electrons involved is what is called "contact". In that sense there is contact.

But what is the contact surface? probably approaching the limit 0, but we mustn't think of 0 as nothing. Rather 0 denotes an undifferentiable object.

1/0, 1 lim-> 0, produces infinity because you are saying differentiate a non-differentiable object, and the potentiality thereof is infinite. The differentiation must continue infinitely on an essentially non-differential object. And this is the way we see reality; as basically a non-differentiable object (noumena) as differentially viewed (phenomena).

Or to put otherwise; the reason Gödel's incompleteness theorem works is because all mathematics is the differentiation of an essentially non-differentiable space so it always depends on something which is not included in the differentiation.

Let say for example; We readily differentiate between nature and nurture and this had led some in the past to think that there was an antagonism of the two, but more over there was this nebulous void in-between where nature and nurture were active. Now, however, we realize that nature and nurture are essentially non-differentiable, you cannot separate them out and the closer you examine the "fine line" between the two the more the line seems to vanish. All perception is differentiation of a fundamentally non-differentiable existence.

At least, IMHO.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
A corroded wiring harness could cause fire. Or maybe she got one of those GMs with the piston-knock.

Karma is cause and effect.

Maybe this woman had issues with mood-regulation.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Add:

White Blood cells (per mm³) in lumbar puncture
Acute bacterial meningitis | 100-5000
Viral meningitis "aseptic" | 10-300
Herpes meningoencephalitis | 0-500
Tuberculosis or cryptococcal| 10-200

Pathogens causing bacterial meningitis: Escherichia coli, Group B, D Streptococcus, Listeria, Haemophilus Influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
My first thought was... "Toxoplasmosis"

It is a neurological condition caused by the parasite Toxoplasma gondii. It can survive in most mammals but it's primary host is the feline (cat).

One of the interesting things about it is that when it infects mice it causes behavioral changes that make the mice seek out cats.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Ethics varies from person to person, but there are very intelligent truth-seekers who realize that underlying all this is a genuine morality. Ethics consists of a set of socially defined strategies. In one society; someone stealing from you is "justified" cause for stealing from them (an eye for an eye) whereas this is not true in all cultures. But it is true in all cultures that stealing is a violation of the right to own property.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Not suggesting a cause here; but women may feel threatened by man's assertiveness and demand for rational answers. Women often cannot give rational answers for their behavior (at least none that don't appeal to biology). She may feel threatened by a man who "has it together". Whereas the man who is upset, and acting irrational himself reassures the woman that her brand of love and compassion is just. Especially since she can't truly reflect on it for herself, man's questions raise just as many uncertainties in the mind of woman, but woman is able to have faith in her own capacity to love, whereas man is likely to question that he is able to love at all. Seeing man upset reassures woman that she already has all the answers and the man's intellectual pursuits are entirely in vain. She can then extend her "loving" arms to the man and re-assure him that he can partake of her love (as long as he plays according to her rules), otherwise he may be deemed "unloving" and worse "unlovable". I guess I tend to see it all as mechanisms of control.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Am I the only person who doesn't feel the need to evaluate a person in such manner as to "like" or "dislike" them? They are what they are.

It's like celebrity is an opportunity for people to take preference where preference isn't really warranted. You wouldn't treat your mother that way, why treat someone else that way?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.


Page 15 of 100     first | prev | next | last

Profile for Ryan S

  • Member Since 2012/08/04


Statistics

Comments

  • Threads Started 1,496
  • Replies Posted 0
  • Likes Received 39
  • Abuse Flags 0
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More