Dear Zeon--Your response to Peter is snarky and inadequate, even though few will understand why. It is sad that in today's internet, ignorance (here, regarding grammar) often goes unnoticed, which, in my opinion, goes a long way toward its perpetuation. By the way: notice how I used the word "which" in the previous sentence. It is the word you should have used instead of "that" in your second paragraph. Finally, here's a suggestion you will never in a million years take: drop the snark and read a good book on grammar.
Cool story--and I admire his love of reading--but how is a guy who has to panhandle to survive "a great role model for the power of reading?!" Or, for that matter, a "role model for our young people?"
Oh, PLEASE! "Spontaneous Human Combustion" has been debunked so many times, only noodleheads who don't know how to review BOTH sides of the issue (via, say...the INTERNET) still believe in this kind of crap. And it's sites like these that don't truly vet the research who perpetuate this. (HINT: check out The Skeptics Society, or The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry; better yet, read up on your Scientific Method.)
Uh...anyone else wondering why the mommy was in such a hurry to abandon her kid alone in the driveway? I get that she was calling for help...but she couldn't pick up the kid and swoop him inside? GOOD MOMMY! YEA!!!
PV=nRT is for gases ONLY, right? If the "pressure was lowered," why would that cause the temperature of the LIQUID to drop? (my understanding is that it wouldn't!) Thermodynamics majors?
"Spontaneous Human Combustion" has been debunked so many times, only noodleheads who don't know how to review BOTH sides of the issue (via, say...the INTERNET) still believe in this kind of crap. And it's sites like these that don't truly vet the research who perpetuate this. (HINT: check out The Skeptics Society, or The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry; better yet, read up on your Scientific Method.)
GOOD MOMMY! YEA!!!
(my understanding is that it wouldn't!)
Thermodynamics majors?