f1rstman's Comments

Honestly? With all of the human rights problems that China has, people are worried about whether or not there are some bits of metal or remote controls implanted in a few goldfish? They don't appear to be in any distress, and I don't see anything wrong with this, whether they were trained, manipulated, or controlled.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
The design isn't actually cut all the way through the leaf as a laser would; the leaf material is scraped away so it's just much thinner in the areas where the leaf is white (note that it's translucent in step 6 of the how-to PDF at the link). The picture above doesn't quite show this - I thought it was just white paint around a stencil.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Interesting - I was just in Kyoto this summer, where there are old townhouses (machiya) arranged the same way (narrow front, long house), for a similar but somewhat different reason: property taxes were assessed based on street frontage!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I didn't want to spend the time waiting for #26 but it sounds like this one that I saw a while ago, which I thought was really cool:

http://izismile.com/2009/06/18/cool_optical_illusion_1_gif.html

There's plenty of others like it out there but I like the caption at the bottom of this one.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Cool work, but why do artists like this go on and on making up crap about the philosophy behind it? "Re-things" blah blah intangible blah blah alchemy blah blah blah. Can't the piece just speak for itself?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Looks like a fun idea, but after the first few shots of the two mini copters, it looks like the rest is completely CGI. Anticlimactic for sure. If they really want to make some buzz they should debut it at something like TED live on stage.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I'm not surprised to see that someone's already put up a counterpoint web site. Their point isn't that "two thousand [and] ten" is correct but that it doesn't matter WHAT you say as long as people know what you mean:

http://www.2000nottwenty.com/

As far as naming the decade, I just hope "noughties" doesn't stick. Blech. I prefer "two thousands" or "oh's" since those probably correspond best to what people used conversationally throughout the decade.

Why do we have this urge to divide history neatly into decades, anyways? George Michael said it best in 1990: "Now everybody's talkin' about this new decade / like you say the magic numbers / then just say goodbye to the stupid mistakes you made..."
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.


Page 3 of 3     first | prev

Profile for f1rstman

  • Member Since 2012/08/04


Statistics

Comments

  • Threads Started 42
  • Replies Posted 0
  • Likes Received 2
  • Abuse Flags 0
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More