anon 14's Comments
You should have paid more attention.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Hi. I am from the internet hate machine. You can ask me questions.
>This makes it seem very America-centric, like only dumbass kids from the states are in on it. Is that correct?
No, we're pretty spread out over the world, unless a lot of people are lying about their nations of origin. Actually I'm sure a lot of us are lying about their nations of origin, but in a spread out way where everyone lies equally and you get a good statistical representation anyway.
>I also missed the trolling of the interview; does that mean they were making up facts to make the interviewer (a brave soul) look like an ass? Kinda like reverse Daily Show interviews?
A little bit, though not as much as some cases. Here's the thing: traditional media is retarded when it comes to covering the internet. This is widely known. When someone from traditional media comes to someone from the internet and asks "hurf durf are you terrorists lol" it's really really really hard to not make fun of them by feeding them obvious lies to see what they believe. However, this article is less stupid than most, so I'm guessing they went light on the mockery. The guy they interviewed seems pretty lame though.
>This is a weird take on ”trolls”. As someone who has had a blog and dealt with trolls, it is not about them deliberately trying to gave a blogger a breakdown. It’s about being vulgar, intolerant, threatening even, because the troll cannot abide with the blogger’s pt of view.
Internet internet internet blarg blurf
>Good article and nice way to invite the troll to neatorama, dont be surprised when they pop in here
sup lol
Anything else I can clear up?
>This makes it seem very America-centric, like only dumbass kids from the states are in on it. Is that correct?
No, we're pretty spread out over the world, unless a lot of people are lying about their nations of origin. Actually I'm sure a lot of us are lying about their nations of origin, but in a spread out way where everyone lies equally and you get a good statistical representation anyway.
>I also missed the trolling of the interview; does that mean they were making up facts to make the interviewer (a brave soul) look like an ass? Kinda like reverse Daily Show interviews?
A little bit, though not as much as some cases. Here's the thing: traditional media is retarded when it comes to covering the internet. This is widely known. When someone from traditional media comes to someone from the internet and asks "hurf durf are you terrorists lol" it's really really really hard to not make fun of them by feeding them obvious lies to see what they believe. However, this article is less stupid than most, so I'm guessing they went light on the mockery. The guy they interviewed seems pretty lame though.
>This is a weird take on ”trolls”. As someone who has had a blog and dealt with trolls, it is not about them deliberately trying to gave a blogger a breakdown. It’s about being vulgar, intolerant, threatening even, because the troll cannot abide with the blogger’s pt of view.
Internet internet internet blarg blurf
>Good article and nice way to invite the troll to neatorama, dont be surprised when they pop in here
sup lol
Anything else I can clear up?
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
wat
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
when I want quality games I go to neatorama.com/ff
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
yes "teh" we should focus on hilarious leet instead
int3rn3t hum0r 3xpar+ "teh" ha$ $p0ken!!!!