Plus, if my friends can mountain bike and play frisbee while high, who are these horribly uncoordinated people who can't even catch a giant inflatable ball?
Well, as I wrote, they can be inexpensive for a non-electric (unheated) one, although the experience can be . . . 'bracing'. If you want to splurge on a multi-hundreds of dollars one, I recommend getting one with a remote control. The control panel is often in a place that is hard to see without some strange contortions. Personally, I think a cord-attached remote would be fine, but I've only seen wireless ones.
So . . . this is not a division of Yum! brands. If the estate of George Orwell can sue for copyright violation on the number "1984", surely Yum! can take action on the letters "KFC".
I see a lot of stuff that is not even as bad as "There is soap in your ..." but instead analogous to "The same chemical in X is used to make soap." That becomes even one more step removed from making sense, and in that particular example with soap you could argue anything with olive oil falls under that category that should be labeled as scary.
That said, as dense and hard to read as some journal articles are, it doesn't take much reading skill to look up something on pubmed and get a gist of some research, especially with a little practice. A bit of arithmetic can go a long way to figuring out how dosages compare to real life situations too. It is just important to remember there might be multiple papers, with results discussing different things or disagreeing for some subtle reason. And that unlike newspaper headlines, science journals rarely will label something as good or bad, and instead typically go for some qualitative impact, which may be both good and bad for the same substance in different situations, or just insignificant.
This is kind of bullshit. I've been involved in the punk scene for a while now, and middle aged punks are not uncommon. Just because they don't fulfill the media stereotype of lather jackets with multicolored liberty spikes doesn't mean someone is not a punk.
Just another article about a subculture written by someone with no real life exposure to it.
That said, as dense and hard to read as some journal articles are, it doesn't take much reading skill to look up something on pubmed and get a gist of some research, especially with a little practice. A bit of arithmetic can go a long way to figuring out how dosages compare to real life situations too. It is just important to remember there might be multiple papers, with results discussing different things or disagreeing for some subtle reason. And that unlike newspaper headlines, science journals rarely will label something as good or bad, and instead typically go for some qualitative impact, which may be both good and bad for the same substance in different situations, or just insignificant.
Where can I get one?
(A few cats will take care of that rat problem in no time.)
Just another article about a subculture written by someone with no real life exposure to it.