I see that O'Reilly and the other conservative pundits (sanskrit for monkey) are saying that the Dems don't want America to win in Iraq. What does winning mean in Iraq, 'Mission Accomplished" notwithstanding? Does it mean we stay until Iraq is subdivided into three countries? Do we stay until there is no sect violence? Do we stay until we kill the 12,000 Al Queda troops built on the landscape of our mismanagement of the after-battle? What are the conditions for winning and who should have defined them when we went in - the Dems?
How many more American citizens is it ok to lose to death and dismemberment until the conditions required to "win" are reached?
How many more American citizens is it ok to lose to death and dismemberment until the conditions required to "win" are reached?