So this isn't new breakthrough technology?

Irrelevant post: When do you find out about the Tokyo Flash watch competition?

Somebody help me out here.

The article regarding badass scientist #6 (Dr. John Paul Stapp) says that he decelerated from 120 mph to 0 mph in 1.4 seconds. I'm not a physicist but that seems like its a deceleration of approximately 38.3 m/s^2 (yes I did do the unit conversions). What I'm confused about is, isn't that only 38.3/9.8 = 4 Gs? The article talks about 18 or 35 Gs! So what am I doing wrong?

But doesn't a math geek imply a someone who is smart? Why are they struggling with such a basic problem?

Thats one addicting game. Damnit! I just lost 20 minutes of my life

What are the products of the bacterial degradation?

No doubt, there is some truth to that article but damn those photos are photoshoped!

Actually, I would love to win the ignoble prize. Maybe more so than the Nobel. You make a contribution to science and yet you make a ton of people laugh.

Its hard to establish a clear cut breaking point. I'm certainly fed up as it is. But as SenorMysterioso said the price goes up gradually and even though people complain they still pay it.

It would be awesome to see a time lapse of a star fish regenerating.

a solid 30seconds of interest.

Sweet!

Watch of choice: JLr7

I took the test and showed the same bias as the columnist. But I also shot two unarmed whites while I only shot one unarmed black. Very interesting test, although I know I'm not racist.

This reminds me of the final destination movies with all of the absurd deaths. Overall, I think its a great instructional movie. I learned my lesson.

This scares me a bit. Google will take over the world and everyone knows it but we don't care because their logo is so cool.