It wasn't your ire I was objecting to. It was your self-righteous arrogance -- which puts you in the same camp as everyone else out their touting their belief systems over others (and don't kid yourself: atheism IS a belief system).
I'm confused, Serotonin -- which one was the "bitter neighbor"? The guy who pointed out the zoning violation, or the guy who put the "cactus" on his house?
I think he thought the referee was on his team. They should make the referees wear some kind of "uniform" to make them easy to distinguish from the players.
Yes, small things get missed, but small things get missed in every reference. The brilliance of Wikipedia is that while there may be a few people adding erroneous information, there are thousands more seeking it out and removing it.
Again, it's been proved to be about as accurate as Encyclopedia Britannica, so questioning its value as a reference is a little disingenuous.
Wikipedia is generally reliable: the journal Nature recently published a study that showed Wikipedia to be about as accurate as Encyclopedia Britannica.
It wasn't your ire I was objecting to. It was your self-righteous arrogance -- which puts you in the same camp as everyone else out their touting their belief systems over others (and don't kid yourself: atheism IS a belief system).
Why would you assume I'm Christian? I'm just someone with a strong distaste for arrogant proselytizing, yours included.
Yes, small things get missed, but small things get missed in every reference. The brilliance of Wikipedia is that while there may be a few people adding erroneous information, there are thousands more seeking it out and removing it.
Again, it's been proved to be about as accurate as Encyclopedia Britannica, so questioning its value as a reference is a little disingenuous.