Miocly 1's Comments
Honda does NOT involve computer imagery. And it was taken in more than one takes yes, but the final product of what you're seeing is in one take. They pressed "record", filmed the whole thing, then pressed "stop", so it's in one take, rather than with lots of editing.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Link doesn't work anymore :(
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
It's just an aquarium at the Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam advertising for a Travel Agency (D-reizen). You can't actually leave your fish there or anything.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
My my, people who comment here really don't know much.
inkedkoi: so… if they knew the women would be cut-out in the end, then why have them pose for the photo in the first place??
Because the real picture was shown in all of the big, mainstream newspapers. The only newspapers that showed the photoshopped version were the ones written by and for the ultra-orthodox, who don't want to see pictures of women. It's really just a fringe of the really religious ones who are this far-out, and in any case it's their right to do so, just like it's your right to watch pornography if you want.
VonSkippy: It's such a tiny part of the Jews who are like that, and the Jews themselves only amount to what, 0.2% of the world population? So what large percentage are you talking about?
Jill:Wow…the ultra-orthodox crowd must be kind of stupid if by just omitting the females from the picture will fool them into thinking that there are no women in the cabinet.
Well no, they're just not showing the pics because they don't want to have to see pictures of women who are not their wives. They're not pretending there aren't any women in the parliament, their names and all were mentioned. Just not the pics. It's not that hard ya'll...
And FYI, the ladies weren't replaced with random guys, the two men were on or near the edges of the original (wider) picture.
And some other comments are really beyond stupid...
inkedkoi: so… if they knew the women would be cut-out in the end, then why have them pose for the photo in the first place??
Because the real picture was shown in all of the big, mainstream newspapers. The only newspapers that showed the photoshopped version were the ones written by and for the ultra-orthodox, who don't want to see pictures of women. It's really just a fringe of the really religious ones who are this far-out, and in any case it's their right to do so, just like it's your right to watch pornography if you want.
VonSkippy: It's such a tiny part of the Jews who are like that, and the Jews themselves only amount to what, 0.2% of the world population? So what large percentage are you talking about?
Jill:Wow…the ultra-orthodox crowd must be kind of stupid if by just omitting the females from the picture will fool them into thinking that there are no women in the cabinet.
Well no, they're just not showing the pics because they don't want to have to see pictures of women who are not their wives. They're not pretending there aren't any women in the parliament, their names and all were mentioned. Just not the pics. It's not that hard ya'll...
And FYI, the ladies weren't replaced with random guys, the two men were on or near the edges of the original (wider) picture.
And some other comments are really beyond stupid...
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Bon jovi guy was definitely a heart breaker, but my favorite has GOT to be the Viking dude.