tp 2's Comments
splint:
.......AND you're gonna have a shit life.
.......AND you're gonna have a shit life.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
angelino - that's because you have no interest in evidence and would rather tow the party line of people who have vested interest in continuing with business as usual.
Clowns. Thats all you have on the climate change deniers side. No evidence, no facts, just as wishy-washy an argument as anyone but, as 'people' pointed out, you lack any interest in objectivity or seeking the truth - you're just on a mission to prove you are right. At least people on the science side of this are open-minded.
I am tired of the onus of proof falling on people who recognise climate change as a real problem. Why should we have to prove that humans make an impact? If the evidence on the other side is so strong, then why isnt the onus on you to prove that human activity has negligible impact on the environment? Good luck on that.
All current evidence shows humans have *some* impact - and need I remind you that humans have no god-given RIGHT to unfairly impact the world. If we make any negative impact, dont we have a duty to change that? If you believe the religion fairytales of life then we are supposed to be the GUARDIANS of the world and living things. So much for that.
2000-2010 looking to be the hottest decade in recorded history.
2009 looking to be the fifth hottest year in recorded history.
I wish that everyone had to get their stance on climate change tattooed on them, so in 50 years if the shit hits the fan, then we can know who to slaughter. Selfish humans.
Clowns. Thats all you have on the climate change deniers side. No evidence, no facts, just as wishy-washy an argument as anyone but, as 'people' pointed out, you lack any interest in objectivity or seeking the truth - you're just on a mission to prove you are right. At least people on the science side of this are open-minded.
I am tired of the onus of proof falling on people who recognise climate change as a real problem. Why should we have to prove that humans make an impact? If the evidence on the other side is so strong, then why isnt the onus on you to prove that human activity has negligible impact on the environment? Good luck on that.
All current evidence shows humans have *some* impact - and need I remind you that humans have no god-given RIGHT to unfairly impact the world. If we make any negative impact, dont we have a duty to change that? If you believe the religion fairytales of life then we are supposed to be the GUARDIANS of the world and living things. So much for that.
2000-2010 looking to be the hottest decade in recorded history.
2009 looking to be the fifth hottest year in recorded history.
I wish that everyone had to get their stance on climate change tattooed on them, so in 50 years if the shit hits the fan, then we can know who to slaughter. Selfish humans.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
That is not the reality at all. If you go to a reputable studio, there is little risk. The biggest risk comes from unhygenic work practices. A clean shop with an autoclave machine (Kills Hep C) which uses new needles for each customer, as is standard practice (most artists will open the sterile packaging right in front of you... ask to see the needles they use beforehand if concerned) will pose next to no danger to your health. Other things to look for: That new ink is poured for your tattoo (not sharing ink between customers).
You, sir are a (probably well-meaning) scaremongering fool.