So all this study is REALLY saying is that people who are so straight-laced that they won't have sex with multiple partners, use drugs recreationally, or drink are unlikely to have tattoos. I mean, obviously? It says much less about what people with tattoos are likely to do.

I'd like to take this article seriously but Malkin is such a joke of a celebrity journalist that everything she says is suspect and most assuredly cherry-picked to show the worst side of any agenda she disagrees with.

I imagine the methane the goats emit are actually worse for the environment than the negative ecological impact of a lawn mower. If cows are as harmful as a car, surely goats are as harmful as a lawnmower.

might be confusing this with wired's listening post, but I'm pretty sure this has already been posted on neatorama some time ago.

I'm surprised no one has mentioned that this law is hardly enforceable. And even if regulatory checks do, in fact, happen, the fact is that even on things like child-labor and fair wage laws, the process is absurdly corrupt and barely effective.

As many have mentioned, we must assume that larger companies will be in a better position to pass these tests than smaller firms.

seven euros is not somewhat pricey by french standards. in fact, it is on the cheap side.