No, I didn't miss your sarcasm, Cream, but you apparently missed mine. That's the problem with the internet, tone and intent are lost. Sending the government after overweight people would be worse than sending them after pot smokers. Can you imagine the defensive stance THEY would take? "My triple cheeseburger and twinkies ain't hurting no one!", blah, blah, blah...
SenorMysterioso and Creampants both have good points.
Pot smokers ALWAYS bring up something worse than what they use to try and justify the fact that they use it, "I smoke pot, but at least I ain't raping old ladies!", or "I smoke pot, but at least I'm not dipping peasants in acid!", etc, etc...
And hell yes there should be some kind of regulation and punishment for people who abuse food. Damn fat asses are more of a drain on the economy than alcoholics, smokers, and potheads combined.
And as for "gregurdumb" (The fact that you are able to display your obviously vast intelligence and imagination in such a short insult is truly astounding). If you spent half as much time refuting my arguments intelligently, instead of insulting me personally, I might have taken you seriously. But no, it's easier, (and less mentally taxing for you, I assume) to hurl insults and epithets.
Alcohol= BAD FOR YOU Cigarette Smoking= BAD FOR YOU Pot Smoking= BAD FOR YOU
Get it now?
It doesn't matter which one you put into your body, they're ALL harmful, and they're ALL addictive. Only difference is pot smokers are the WORST in regards to going on the defensive when someone questions their RIGHT to engage in stupid, self destructive habits.
Wow, the potheads get really touchy when you try to make them take responsibility for their actions and introduce a little guilt into the equation. But what do I care? Smoke more pot if you want to, it's only brain cells, after all...
In our area, at the local (and much maligned) 99 cent store, cans of Spam can be had for, you guessed it, 99 cents. Certainly cheaper than ground beef, and mighty tasty IMNSHO.
I hate, Hate, HATE skunks. I wish every Godforsaken one of them would drop dead. They serve absolutely no purpose whatsoever in the grand scheme of things other than to make people miserable. My dog has been sprayed twice by these filthy animals after they somehow got into our yard.
Let's all observe a moment of silence for all the overly sensitive babies who have been butt-hurt by a cartoon, and let's hope their declarations of never returning to this site are kept.
With that said, my opinion of the cartoon is as follows: BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Pot smokers ALWAYS bring up something worse than what they use to try and justify the fact that they use it, "I smoke pot, but at least I ain't raping old ladies!", or "I smoke pot, but at least I'm not dipping peasants in acid!", etc, etc...
And hell yes there should be some kind of regulation and punishment for people who abuse food. Damn fat asses are more of a drain on the economy than alcoholics, smokers, and potheads combined.
And as for "gregurdumb" (The fact that you are able to display your obviously vast intelligence and imagination in such a short insult is truly astounding). If you spent half as much time refuting my arguments intelligently, instead of insulting me personally, I might have taken you seriously. But no, it's easier, (and less mentally taxing for you, I assume) to hurl insults and epithets.
Alcohol= BAD FOR YOU
Cigarette Smoking= BAD FOR YOU
Pot Smoking= BAD FOR YOU
Get it now?
It doesn't matter which one you put into your body, they're ALL harmful, and they're ALL addictive. Only difference is pot smokers are the WORST in regards to going on the defensive when someone questions their RIGHT to engage in stupid, self destructive habits.
Oh, and way to go with the lowest common denominator there by resorting to name-calling.
I bet there's more than a few residents of Oakland who would kill (literally) for the chance to own this "wonderful" specimen...
With that said, my opinion of the cartoon is as follows: BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!