I agree with the two styles. But instead of thinking of them as Male and Female relationships, I think of them as masculine and feminine. As a male, I have both, but I lean strongly towards male relationships. I know males who lean towards female relationships as well. The relationships themselves have either feminine or masculine qualities. It does not mean that Men have strictly male relationships and females have strictly female relationships.
Everybody who is so defensive on here needs to read the article again. Not once does it state that tattoos cause deviant behaviour. That would be ridiculous. It's ink, how would it make you wanna go commit crimes?
They are saying there is a correlation, and only in cases with heavy tattooing/piercing. And in their study, only 4 percent qualified as heavy tattooing, so calling it commonplace is not really all that valid (although 14% had some form of tattoos).
It never stated that having a tattoo suddenly is going to make you wanna go binge drink, rob a bank, and then find a threesome somewhere. It did say that there was a significantly higher ratio of these instances in people that are heavily tattood. Yes, you can be a promiscuous pot-head without tattoos, but if you were in a mall and asked to spot out someone who was a binge drinking pot-head, then your best bet would be on the guy (or girl) with heavy tattoos.
Though I do think the sex with multiple partners being a deviant behaviour is pretty silly, it's far too outdated.
I really didn't like the video's conclusions. They blamed it squarely on the Mink. The Mink had nothing to do with the issue at all. If there were no Mink, but a strong Squirrel smell, many probably still would have jumped. Maybe they were just curious. The fact that a Mink, or a squirrel, or any other animal leaves in the vicinity of a bridge doesn't really face the problem itself, which is a cliff that looks like a fence to a dog.
The problem is the bridge itself, and targetting the Mink, through really bad testing and jumping to conclusions, really only avoids the issue entirely with a terrible solution.
Instead they could actually either educate and put up signs and warnings, as well as make leashes mandatory in that area(easy), or even use structural additions to the bridge to make it much more difficult for a dog to jump over(hard).
They are saying there is a correlation, and only in cases with heavy tattooing/piercing. And in their study, only 4 percent qualified as heavy tattooing, so calling it commonplace is not really all that valid (although 14% had some form of tattoos).
It never stated that having a tattoo suddenly is going to make you wanna go binge drink, rob a bank, and then find a threesome somewhere. It did say that there was a significantly higher ratio of these instances in people that are heavily tattood. Yes, you can be a promiscuous pot-head without tattoos, but if you were in a mall and asked to spot out someone who was a binge drinking pot-head, then your best bet would be on the guy (or girl) with heavy tattoos.
Though I do think the sex with multiple partners being a deviant behaviour is pretty silly, it's far too outdated.
The problem is the bridge itself, and targetting the Mink, through really bad testing and jumping to conclusions, really only avoids the issue entirely with a terrible solution.
Instead they could actually either educate and put up signs and warnings, as well as make leashes mandatory in that area(easy), or even use structural additions to the bridge to make it much more difficult for a dog to jump over(hard).