Richard Wrangham is a pinhead, heating food too much destroys nutrients and makes most food into empty calories, most evidence suggests that we ate a raw diet. Once again, no evidence but much speculation and imaginary images that have no place in science.
Why do you insist on pinning all your problems with the world on Christianity or religion in general. Seems to me that deep down inside you know the truth but don't want the truth so you live a veraciously biased life without even acknowledging that you are a fascist.
Wes Research the quotes, you will find that even Steven J. Gould and others admit to there not being enough intermediates in the fossil record that is why they have come up with the punctuated equilibrium theory. Also science is observable and repeatable by definition. So if we are talking about evolution from a scientific debate, show me where an animal has changed from one kind to another that has been observed and repeated. There is not even a single case.
Felix + GQ, What has evolution brought to us in terms of science on its own basis? THere is no evidence here for the evolution of plants, in fact plants pose quite the problem for uniformitarians. GQ I have to disagree. Since leading evolutionists cannot find sufficient intermediate fossils in the fossil record, the most commonly used argument is that punctuated equilibrium (sudden change) is the driving force of evolution. I think it is you that needs to do some reading. Evolutionists when confronted with a major issue and threat to their theory just stick their finger in the wind to see which way it blows and go with some other unprovable theory. Bozko makes a good point in why don't we see any intermediatary evolution taking place right now. I think i know why.
I meant "existence" not existents.
Why do you insist on pinning all your problems with the world on Christianity or religion in general. Seems to me that deep down inside you know the truth but don't want the truth so you live a veraciously biased life without even acknowledging that you are a fascist.
Chew on this, the immaterial proves the existents of God.
Research the quotes, you will find that even Steven J. Gould and others admit to there not being enough intermediates in the fossil record that is why they have come up with the punctuated equilibrium theory. Also science is observable and repeatable by definition. So if we are talking about evolution from a scientific debate, show me where an animal has changed from one kind to another that has been observed and repeated. There is not even a single case.
What has evolution brought to us in terms of science on its own basis?
THere is no evidence here for the evolution of plants, in fact plants pose quite the problem for uniformitarians. GQ I have to disagree. Since leading evolutionists cannot find sufficient intermediate fossils in the fossil record, the most commonly used argument is that punctuated equilibrium (sudden change) is the driving force of evolution. I think it is you that needs to do some reading. Evolutionists when confronted with a major issue and threat to their theory just stick their finger in the wind to see which way it blows and go with some other unprovable theory. Bozko makes a good point in why don't we see any intermediatary evolution taking place right now. I think i know why.