66. Fun quiz. I kept on trying to figure out what was in the #4 spot. Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I agree with Sparge and Leven. As soon as I ran across the word 'predict' then it became valid. If the statement had read: "Therefore every future examination of water will reveal the same chemical composition.", that would have been invalid. A very subtle but drastic difference. Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Hmmm. His years long search consisted of googling one time, then 4 years later googling again. Pretty comprehensive & detailed. He shouldn't be at Lowe's, he belongs at the FBI. Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
How fun... Got 'em all with 7:39 remaining. As mentioned above, I remembered them in geographical order. Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
If the statement had read: "Therefore every future examination of water will reveal the same chemical composition.", that would have been invalid.
A very subtle but drastic difference.