Andy 1's Comments
Carl writes
> Fascinating. It’s surprising how often the bible’s record of history gets proven right over the reactionary “scientific†supposition. Weird.
Yep. Sure.
By the way, your Bible doesn't mention what happened to all the fish when the earth was "flooded". My fish in my fishtank die if the temperature drops below 26 degrees. Flooding the earth would change the salinity and temperature of the rivers/oceans. How could sea life exist after the flood?
You Christians revise your theories every century or so. This has been the century the Church admitted the earth is round. Before then you claimed slavery was dinky, before then it was okay to burn witches, before then it was okay to kill Arabs to satisfy the political aims of the church. If the Bible were infallible then why is it neccessary to have such drastic revisions as often as you make them?
> Fascinating. It’s surprising how often the bible’s record of history gets proven right over the reactionary “scientific†supposition. Weird.
Yep. Sure.
By the way, your Bible doesn't mention what happened to all the fish when the earth was "flooded". My fish in my fishtank die if the temperature drops below 26 degrees. Flooding the earth would change the salinity and temperature of the rivers/oceans. How could sea life exist after the flood?
You Christians revise your theories every century or so. This has been the century the Church admitted the earth is round. Before then you claimed slavery was dinky, before then it was okay to burn witches, before then it was okay to kill Arabs to satisfy the political aims of the church. If the Bible were infallible then why is it neccessary to have such drastic revisions as often as you make them?
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
This is not "neat", it's really horrible.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Not that I want to have the last word or anything, but you forgot shellfish and insects. Or was your post also shortened over concern over length. You only had one "begat" in there afterall.