SuperCrap, you may wish to read through http://www.prb.org/pdf06/HowHIVAIDSAffectsPopulations.pdf and compare the numbers there with what you find under "HIV Risk Factor: sexual orientation" within http://www.apositivelife.com/forasos/demographic-risk-factors-for-hiv.html
When you're done, you might want to give a little more thought to how "the population of the United States" is not the same thing as "the human population." Fact.
Not so much, at least from those pictures. Looks like most people are able to look past appearances when choosing their representatives.
Not saying that having a pretty face won't give you a popularity boost, though--and probably the better they look, the more likely they can get away with a lack of substance or integrity.
Long enough so that no one alive could have known someone who knew the person who died (around 200 years)?
Personally, I think that's the degree of removal I'd be okay with as a rule of thumb, though I'm sure I could come up with exceptions in either direction.
There's a discussion in the comments after the article that addresses the state of the climate then. Doesn't appear to be any conflict with current climate theory.
When you're done, you might want to give a little more thought to how "the population of the United States" is not the same thing as "the human population." Fact.
(By the way, the region that smeared "like" and "totally" into our speech has no place criticizing "hella." So there.)
Not saying that having a pretty face won't give you a popularity boost, though--and probably the better they look, the more likely they can get away with a lack of substance or integrity.
No, wait.
Despicable.
Personally, I think that's the degree of removal I'd be okay with as a rule of thumb, though I'm sure I could come up with exceptions in either direction.