I think you may have forgotten the link?

So their proof that it is "likely" where a claimed event happened is that it's in a similar area and has a nook for a chair. And it took from 1980 to now for them to notice the chair nook (nobody else ever thought of having a chair in a courtyard! Hope it isn't a "comfy chair"). Well I'm sold. More evidence than the vast majority of the dogma of the religious is based on ("it wouldn't be faith if you didn't have to believe some absolutely nutty things for which there was no remotely convincing evidence" - some slight paraphrasing)

"therefore we all have an opinion of equal validity," No we don't. That's some "false balance" type journalism there. The opinion of a trained and experienced expert in something is far more valid than that of some whacko. Take the flat Earth people for example. Invalid. (google the definition of valid before you argue).

"Toddler recreates" is rather a lot like those headlines of "Toddler writes book of poetry". At least some adult editing/involvement is there.. and where does one then draw the line of when it stops being the toddler's "work"?

Stretches here: May have survived landing. May have somehow become rehydrated (on a dry satellite) and thus become self-mobile. May have escaped containment. May be able to survive enough to reproduce. *lots of other steps* May have taken over moon.

Are you sure he died of "the penis injury" (or from the infection he got from the damage done during the whale bone thing)? A current argument from some seems to be that people don't die of [that current plague thingy], they instead die of pre-existing conditions (such as being older than 49 - the pivot point where death becomes much more likely). So shouldn't we say he died of the (first) UTI? Although you could argue the resulting second infection was a UTI also, so blame the UTI's all the way!

That seems a very overarching question.

That's what gravy is made of. And what it is MEANT to be made of. It's the bits of chicken and flour and whatnot that fall off as it cooks. Just like if you cook it in an oven and then use what is left in the dish.. (just oilier because it's from a pressurised deep fryer).

Jason: you are obviously putting a lot of time and effort into these, and I note the parts at the end. It is a nice message. And you are improving. It's a strange style you are using, and I don't find it funny at all, but you seem to find it worth doing and are building skills in doing so. Kudos to you for that. Reminds me a bit of Monty Python's Terry Gilliam - and he went far. However if you are going to keep spending such time and effort, you should familiarise yourself with copyright. It doesn't work the way you seem to think it does. There is a good video explaining how it really works by Tom Scott from earlier this year (specifically on how it works on youtube as well as at large) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Jwo5qc78QU