dnc's Liked Comments

First I had to move the bread basket and cereal boxes on top of the frig out of the way to check. Cookie cutters on one side and a thermal lunch bad in the shape of a cat that my daughter hasn't used in several years. We only makes cookies once a year at Christmas and that is done at grandma's house with her own cutters.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I was thinking the same thing about uniformed vs. regular clothes. Also, paint to mark the wolves? Wouldn't the wolves still need the camouflage to blend in and survive?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Wow, trying to read the words on the candy in the pictures is just like what it feels like to try and read words in my dreams. Very unsettling, creepy, and weird, especially given the context of the pictures and how the candy looks familiar, but I know that something is off. Like seeing a photo of my dreams. Yikes.
The runes on some of the candy corn was creepy. No way that I'm eating those.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I think what he is trying to say has nothing to do with the cost of the tattoo, but with the amount of effort of thinking about what kind to get. Immediate gratification. You see something, and don't think about if it is a good idea to get it done. A person doesn't want to feel hungry, so they get the chips from the kitchen instead of the food that is best for them, just so that they do not feel hungry. At the time they don't care about the consequences, but there will be consequences later on.
So for tattoos, people see something on another person, or in a book, and decide that's the one they want, not thinking about the future implications. Those Tattoos are the "Chips in the kitchen". It would be better to wait for that person to see if their feelings change or that of the trends, but they don't. Or if there is something better out there. I research cars to death when I buy a new one. Something might look cool but is it worth the price and financial pain later on because what is under the hood is junk?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I wouldn't play it at a wedding, but that's not the purpose of the song. On study.com they said it was written in response to someone telling Billy Joel that it was more difficult to grow up in the 80s. Billy Joel was showing all the conflicts and difficulties since his birth in the 40s to prove a point. So the musical style fits the purpose of the song. The song had to be fast pace , panicky, and anxiety inducing to get through the list of events (around 120 or so) and express the feeling of the events. In that sense, it's a great song and one that I have always liked and appreciated. Thought provoking too:. What would we write in it today? Stings equivalent to this song would be "I Hope the Russians love their Children too".
We are always quoting "We Didn't Start the Fire" around the home. I think another article on Neatorama said a song with a repetitive lyrics also is more likely to reach the top 10 charts, so that could be a possibility too.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.


Page 3 of 7     first | prev | next | last

Profile for dnc

  • Member Since 2017/04/05


Statistics

Comments

  • Threads Started 218
  • Replies Posted 17
  • Likes Received 93
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More