Well, that would be my point: find out something about the topic, the source, the history--anything at all--before looking at something out of context and judging it, especially if you are going to publish that judgment.
If, for instance, the writer had looked up the newspaper in something as simple as Wikipedia, he might have said, "Despite years of voluntary cleavage, The Sun's request brought out the trolls." Or something. Anything besides, "hey, look at this--isn't it stupid?"

Nice to know you all have some sense of history and life outside of the US. The Sun has had Page 3 girls for decades--not that that makes it right, but there is more to life than is dreamed of, in your reality.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sun_Newspaper

Over and over, Neatorama makes the same mistake of letting people write about things they have no background or actual knowledge in. All of those "can you believe they let us play with that" or "movies that scarred us and didn't they know it was wrong" sorts of articles, that grab one tiny piece of information (usually visual) and make believe it exists in a vacuum.

C'mon, people, if you're going to be amazed by something, find out something about it before you print.

Of course, this would make more sense if all of these were Disney's stories, instead of including stories three- or five-hundred years old.