"About 1 in 2.5 adults under the age of 40 has been inked."
Awesome. That means in 30 years 1 in 2.5 adults will have a tattoo of either a blurry tribal line or of Ernest Borgnine floating around on their flabby body. Hooray.
What I love about this story is that they've managed to generalize all the tats people get and where they put them. Yet, if one were to ask those people why they got it, they always say something like "for myself. I wanted something unique."
Great. Now you're unique...just like everyone else.
This is good news. Now he has another chance to get a different job.
While I sympathize with his past condition, I'm not walking on egg shells for him. He wants to get back into it, fine. I just think I should be allowed the same ability to call him a dick for doing so.
Because as a baby you KNEW who it was coming from.
That said, I'm going to need to see what these 15 chicks look like before I start in on a "boobie sundae."
If you don't get his work, just say "I don't get it." But ripping on the work will do nothing to its credibility - which is rather voluminous.
It isn't. It's just the "opposite" of what was. That's the mentality of the vandals.
Awesome. That means in 30 years 1 in 2.5 adults will have a tattoo of either a blurry tribal line or of Ernest Borgnine floating around on their flabby body. Hooray.
What I love about this story is that they've managed to generalize all the tats people get and where they put them. Yet, if one were to ask those people why they got it, they always say something like "for myself. I wanted something unique."
Great. Now you're unique...just like everyone else.
While I sympathize with his past condition, I'm not walking on egg shells for him. He wants to get back into it, fine. I just think I should be allowed the same ability to call him a dick for doing so.