Or maybe he's just a freak of nature.

Not very likely, but more plausible than Bigfoot. What would they eat and without a viable population none would reproduce.

It's just a marketing gimmick.

Internet/TV $120/month, ~$70/month cannabis, rent and electric for subsidized housing $306/month, food ~$250/month, car $40+/month. SSI sole income $931/month and I am a compulsive saver of anything left. Cap for upper molar with no opposing lower $1,000-1,500, extraction if it goes rotten $0-84.

What else would it look like other than a wolf/coyote variant? They didn't have any use for lapdogs.

HA HA, I guessed right.

My sister-in-law's house in Santa Rosa burned downed although I don't think it was in a fire danger zone. That fire was what I would call a fire hurricane with 80 mph winds if I remember correctly that carried embers for miles.
People who build and love in high fire danger zones need to pay for fire insurance and not count on government to pay for their risky behavior.

At the time they were built they were affordable for the middle class that is disappearing.

Introverts unite!

why prop up the regime with the hard currency it desperately needs when none of it goes to the people of NK?

no, they are wild animals and should not be owned as pets. why would anyone want a fox as a pet when there are shelter dogs begging for a home?

real joel is one of the fake hucksters selling false hope to rubes.