Science fiction addressed our feelings about robots long before we actually had humanoid robots. The word itself came from the 1920 play R.U.R. (Rossum’s Universal Robots), in which mechanical men are exploited for their labor until they rebel. A similar theme lurks under the surface in the 1927 film Metropolis. Both stories made the treatment of robots an analogy for the treatment of laborers because we are bound to sympathize with a robot who looks like a human. But it's not a human, so businesses were keen to appeal to the exploitive side of humanity by offering labor-saving robots to ease our personal burdens. This motive was personified by a robot named Eric that was introduced to audiences in 1928.
Eric wasn't a true robot as we think of them today. His movements were remote-controlled and his voice was pre-recorded, but he seemed human enough to spark sympathy from people he met. For 1928, he was a miracle of a mechanical man. Almost 100 years later, we still haven't perfected humanoid robots, and we haven't truly sorted out our feelings about them either. The working robots we have, from oversized factory arms to Roombas, don't look anything like a person. Read about Eric the Robot and some early ideas about robot labor at Popular Science. -via Damn Interesting
