David Bird's Becorns



For years, David Bird was a designer for LEGO. After going freelance, he still designs characters, but these are his own. Bird makes small woodland creatures he calls "becorns," made from acorns, pine cones, sticks, and other natural materials. He sets the becorns outside and waits for real woodland creatures to approach, and then photographs the encounters. Bird says this technique requires lots of patience and birdseed. You can see some of the process in a promotional video.



For this one, the frog was already there, and stayed still while Bird placed the becorns around him. Continue reading to see more of Bird's delightful becorns and their new friends.



Click to the right to see how this catbird twists its head to take the blueberry without harming the becorn.



The story of getting this shot is amazing.

I feel really lucky to have stumbled on this creative process that continues to surprise me. I had no idea I’d get a mouse riding shot! Yesterday I caught this mouse in my garage and I didn’t want to keep it waiting, so I rifled through all my Becorns. I chose Go Go, envisioning a shot with the two of them running side by side, hurrying to get to somewhere. Then lo and behold, I released the mouse and it ran right between Go Go’s legs! Watch my last post to see the video.

“Gerald was in awe of this mother’s dedication to its young. He himself was born from a tree, and while it had provided some shelter, he found himself wishing for the love and affection that a more attentive mother would’ve provided.”

This is a composite of two photographs, because Bird didn't want to disturb the family while the nestling was so young. But as you can see below, turnabout is fair play.



See more of Bird's becorns at Instagram. -via Everlasting Blort


Comments (0)

Two out of three ain't good either. One of the earliest trials of Zener cards to test for ESP showed a statistically significant result, with one subject scoring almost 100%. By chance anything is possible. If the probability of something is 1:100 then we should expect to see it one out of a hundred times. But instead we assume we should never see it. Never-the-less it is possible for someone to guess correctly on the Zener cards over several trials, enough to give the impression of genuine ESP.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Playing poker can help resolve those kinds of errors in judgement. You find yourself saying "what are the chances?" quite frequently. Thus, professional poker players assert that the only true method of winning is over time. If your chance of winning is greater than 50% you only have to have enough money to keep playing until it pays off. So, if you are going to play poker you play tables that have a buy-in value 1/10th or less than your total bankroll, and you play hands that have a 50% or greater chance to win. That way you shouldn't go broke before you start to see some winnings and over-all you should win more than you lose. But this is assuming you are capable of keeping your ego in check. You simply cannot expect to win because your hand has a 99% probability to win, you'll lose everything playing that way.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@Miss Cellania

I was referring to 2/3 being an indication of some kind of empirical fact of the cat's intellectual or visual acuity. I'm skeptical the cat even has object permamence, let alone the ability to track the hidden object over multiple transitions.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Not that I'm claiming this is much more than luck, but if you watch closely the 2nd shuffle (the one where the cat loses), the shell the cat "chose" is actually the one that originally had the pebbleorwhateveritwas underneath it. At 0:14 the shuffler slyly moves it under another shell, right before starting the shuffle. Easily missed, even by the most sharp-eyed of cats.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I will remind you of the rule we have around here: no personal attacks on other commenters. I have removed a couple of comments. Let's keep this discussion on the subject and no more name calling.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I was referring to 2/3 being an indication of some kind of empirical fact of the cat's intellectual or visual acuity. I'm skeptical the cat even has object permamence, let alone the ability to track the hidden object over multiple transitions.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@Jesss

Thanks for the link. I thought about it some more last night too. I have two cats and figured they probably have object permanence based on my experiences with them.

@Miss Cellania

Sorry for being overly critical. My mind is in the books and found I was extraordinarily critical yesterday, though I'm finding I'm fairly critical most of the time. In Philosophy criticism and argument take a different non-hostile form, and I forget that doesn't apply colloquially. The video is cute, but I guess I'm much more interested in the cognition of the cat.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Email This Post to a Friend
"David Bird's Becorns"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More