Why Are There No Horse-Sized Rabbits?

The simple question of why rabbits remain so small opens a pathway to a big part of evolutionary science. Since certain species of animals only exist in small sizes, while some exist in big and small sizes, one might ask: what causes some animal species or taxonomies to have carrying sizes? Researchers from Kyoto University explored this topic in evolutionary science by studying rabbits, ungulates, and lagomorphs

They found that once lagomorphs reach around 6 kilograms (about 14 lbs) in mass, they're at a competitive disadvantage to ungulates.
The researchers point out that there are other factors that come into play once lagomorphs become too big to operate at optimum capacity: competition from other animals from the same clade and increased danger from predators.
However, it's the ungulate comparison that seems to have had the most effect in this case. The research feeds into two contrasting ideas about how species evolve: the 'red queen' hypothesis, which ascribes most importance to species competition, and the 'court jester' hypothesis, which says abiotic forces like climate changes have the most impact.
According to the research, it seems that the red queen model is the one that's most significant here, against the backdrop of abiotic forces that aren't anything to do with animal competition.

Image via wikimedia commons 


Newest 1
Newest 1 Comment

Login to comment.
Email This Post to a Friend
"Why Are There No Horse-Sized Rabbits?"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More