Should Animals Be Given 'Human Rights' Too? The Story of Happy the Elephant

People have been given inalienable rights by law as set in the Constitution which, for one, gives them the right to be free, make their own decisions without being impeded by anyone or anything. This is fundamentally based on the idea that humans have been born with free will and having the capacity to do what is good for them without stepping on other people's rights.

For animals, we never really thought about such and animal rights enshrined in animal welfare laws only govern how people should treat animals. However, we have to also take into consideration that animals, much like people, live in their own societies and communities. Happy is an elephant who is currently in the care of the Bronx Zoo and, since the death of an elephant companion in 2006, has lived alone.

For a member of a species renowned for both intelligence and sociality, the setting is far from natural. In the wild, Happy would share a many-square-mile home range with a lifelong extended family, their bonds so close-knit that witnessing death produces symptoms akin to post-traumatic stress disorder in humans. It would seem that Happy, despite the devotions of the people who care for her, is not living her best life.

So now, an advocacy group called the Nonhuman Rights Project is making a case for animals and has been fighting for Happy's release.

Since 2013, the group has filed lawsuits on behalf of four captive chimpanzees in New York and, in neighboring Connecticut, three elephants used in a traveling circus. They’ve lost those cases, but they have persuaded judges to take them seriously, and in October petitioned a New York state court to order Happy’s release. She wouldn’t be returned to the wild, but would be transferred to a sanctuary in California with more space and the company of other elephants.

Read more on The Atlantic.

(Image credit: Larry Li/Unsplash)


I guess my answer would be "when possible". Picture yourself in the desert with a group of humans and elephants/camels. You're starving, and there's a chance you could survive if you start eating your transportation animals. What do you do? The answer is: depends on what you can do. Is there anything ethical about both groups dying, when one could be saved? Is anything really ethical in a universe of endless murder? While we ponder that, you might eat some elephant steak before you starve to death. Or not.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 3 comments
Email This Post to a Friend
"Should Animals Be Given 'Human Rights' Too? The Story of Happy the Elephant"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More