Of course, researchers have already made plenty of efforts to directly integrate nerves and prosthetics. But, according to Dirk, they typically “didn’t use technology that was compatible with nerve fibers,” which are tightly bundled and flexible. “Nerves need to grow and move around; they’re not going to integrate well with a stiff interface.”
Yes, the material comprising the scaffold had to be flexible and fluid, but it also needed to be extremely conductive. Nerve signals are highly localized, and also very, very subtle. An effective neural-prosthetic interface would need to transmit thousands of different signals per second to mimic the behavior of a real limb and its relationship to the brain and body.
To create that ideal interface, Dirk and his colleagues developed their own biocompatible polymers, meant to mimic the properties of nerve tissue. The material is also porous, so that nerves can extend through it, and lined with electrodes, to vastly enhance conductivity.
The new polymer has tested well in rats, but its use in humans is still years away. Link
(Image credit: Flickr user Chris Corwin)
Same logic when it comes to not using untested cancer treatments or pain meds on terminal patients. They have stage 4 cancer..... it is not like you are going to do them much harm at this point. I am pretty sure someone facing certain death would sign a waiver for you to test some new treatment on them. Even if it doesn't help them the data you get from it could greatly speed up cancer treatment technology.
Or new nerve regeneration technology for people with spine injuries. If I am paralysis from the neck down you can pump me full of anything that has even a 1 in 1000 chance of restoring my ability to function.
There's a line somewhere after which human volunteers will be welcome, but an amputee is way different from a terminal cancer patient.