Woman Pays $50k To Clone Her Dog


(YouTube Link)

The death of a beloved pet can be a traumatizing experience, and most people love their pets as they would any other member of their family. But would you pay $50,000 to clone a new version of your beloved pet from the DNA of the deceased? The lady in this clip didn't hesitate to head over to South Korea, shell out the cash and clone her deceased dog Trouble, and she seems to have no regrets about her decision.

It seems like a huge waste of money to me, considering that the cloned pet probably isn't going to have anything in common with it's genetic original beyond physical appearance, but what do you guys think? If you had $50k to spare, and you're grieving the passing of a pet, would you choose to have them cloned?

--via Videogum


It's even worse if you consider that the clone may very well not even look like the original.

The only thing they'll have in common is genetic material... so yeah, if you love your pet's genes, why not.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I think it would be *interesting* to know if the dog would have anything in common with the original dog. I don't think it's an area where the science is very known.

But so far I haven't heard of any cloning where the clone doesn't have severe genetic defects and dies after a few years. That would also be interesting to see - if it's possible to make a *healthy* clone.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@Mirar, the clone would have the same DNA as the original, obviously, but that's about all we can say. There are many (so-called epigenetic) factors that determine how the organism develops.

If you want an example of a healthy clone, see Cc (aka Copycat) the first cloned cat, born in 2001 and as far as I'm aware still alive. By the way she doesn't look anything like her "mother".
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Why pay that much to clone your pet, when you can give a home to a much less expensive shelter pet who needs a home?

Besides, all living things die eventually. We all must learn to deal with that. And cloning won't even bring your dead pet back. You'd just get an eerily similar one.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I did see the episode of This American Life with that Brahma Bull that they cloned and turned out with a more violent disposition. But, even after seeing this, i know that if i was filthy rich,and $50k wasn't no thang, i would clone my little Manx cat, Bunny, that i just lost. it was a very recent loss, and i know it won't be her same awesome personality, but i would take that chance just to feel like she's still with us... it's probably just the grief talking though- $50k? ask me in a month if i would put $50k into a "replica" of my lost pet and i'd probably say no. i'm betting this decision to clone was more of an impulse decision immediately following her dog's death. i remember thinking the day it happened that i would do anything to have my kitty back. she was the sunshine of my life...
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Most animal clones have defects and must be put down. To get to a healthy, viable clone, others along the way suffer.
If I had that kind of money to burn, I think of how many dogs I could save by giving it to shelters.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Dougert- Actually I think it took her like three years, and she had to save up the money, so it wasn't an impulse decision. (Saw her on an episode of "I Cloned My Pet" on TLC.)
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Its appauling that idiot people will spend this kind of money for their pets but scoff at helping humanity. She should have donated the money to a homeless shelter, or other cause to help humans, if humans are well taken care of then more pets will be taken care of.

some people should just be removed from the genepool, and this lady fits the bill. hopefully she's doesn't have any real "kids".
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Interesting how we have this conception that a clone would be the same thing as the real thing. You are an individual. To avoid the term "soul", let's use the word "essence". When you die, your essence would go somewhere else, or dissipate or whatever. You could not recreate that same essence in a cloned body, unless you could first capture the original essence and transfer it to the cloned body. The essence of the clone, whether it's a human or animal clone, would be completely different.
Lady's dog is dead and no amount of science is bringing it back. Just like Swedish06's son's clone wouldn't be the same thing. Just go have another baby or find another pet - your loved one is not returning.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@ Ted

I think the "essence" you speak of is more the personality of the creature that is a sum of it's life experiences.

Since no two animals have the exact same experiences in life their individual "essence" would not be the same.

Also I don't think science has figured out how to fix the short telomeres issue that caused Dolly to die of old age at half her expected life expectance. Clones that come from donor cells have the same length telemeres as the original at their current age and so will physically age at a accelerated rate to catch up to the orginal so that both of them die around the same time.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Anderson needs to work on his mock shock. I was not convinced that he had not seen the photos of that woman's home several times, in multiple production meetings, before the taping.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 19 comments
Email This Post to a Friend
"Woman Pays $50k To Clone Her Dog"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More