I'm not a fan of The Lord of the Rings, but I have wondered how such a monumentally influential author was overlooked for a Nobel Prize in literature. C.S. Lewis nominated J.R.R. Tolkien in 1961. The governing committee considered him, but ultimately awarded the prize to the Yugoslavian writer Ivo Andric. Why? Recently declassified documents explain the committee's reasoning:
Do you agree with the Nobel committee?
Link -via blastr | Photo: Biography Channel
Swedish reporter Andreas Ekström delved into 1961's previously classified documents on their release this week, to find the jury passed over names including Lawrence Durrell, Robert Frost, Graham Greene, EM Forster and Tolkien to come up with their eventual winner, Yugoslavian writer Ivo Andri?. [...]
The prose of Tolkien – who was nominated by his friend and fellow fantasy author CS Lewis – "has not in any way measured up to storytelling of the highest quality", wrote jury member Anders Österling. Frost, on the other hand, was dismissed because of his "advanced age" – he was 86 at the time – with the jury deciding the American poet's years were "a fundamental obstacle, which the committee regretfully found it necessary to state". Forster was also ruled out for his age – a consideration that no longer bothers the jury, which awarded the prize to the 87-year-old Doris Lessing in 2007 – with Österling calling the author "a shadow of his former self, with long lost spiritual health".
Durrell, meanwhile, "gives a dubious aftertaste … because of [his] monomaniacal preoccupation with erotic complications", while Italian novelist Alberto Moravia "suffers from … a general monotony".
Greene, who never won the Nobel, was 1961's runner-up, with Danish writer Karen Blixen, author of Out of Africa, coming in third.
Do you agree with the Nobel committee?
Link -via blastr | Photo: Biography Channel
True story.
As for Tolkien, the Hobbit was a way better story as far as books go. I read LOTR years ago, and it's a hu-uge disappointment to read. I doubt I could wade through it again today.
So his reasons for his "great" work were specious and his story telling dull. Getting bogged down in pointless detail may appeal to geeks, but it isn't great story telling. The guy was totally overrated and did not deserve a Nobel prize.
There are many writers who deserved the Nobel, Joyce, Virginia Wolf, Tolstoy, Rushdie, Emile Zola, but never recieved it, and Tolkien is definitely not one of them.
They didn't award it for the same reason WarHammer novelizations don't win. It's turgid power-fantasy nonsense aimed at 13-year old boys. Give it for LOTR, you might as well give it for Noddy books and Marvel comic story arcs. The reason for Robert Frost not getting the nod was vile.
Philboyd, way to go! You've now demonstrated that you didn't understand the books at all, if you ever read them. (If you're just making this comment based on the movies, you're even more to blame for being so absurdly silly.)
Whether Tolkien deserved a Nobel is another question, but some of the comments on this thread are just silly.