Ever since digital cameras and Photoshop have become commonplace in our society, more and more people have decided that they are "professional photographers" despite having no training or experience. You Are Not A Photographer compiles these terrible images in one convenient location. While some of the pictures aren't utterly terrible, others, like the one above, seem to be disasters that someone decided are "artistic."
And in case you're wondering, yes, all of the images come from people who claim to be professionals.
http://youarenotaphotog.tumblr.com
But many of the sorts of disasters shown on this site are nothing new. BITD the equivalent of Photoshop was a box of Cokin filters and a hand toning kit. But in those days the cost of calling yourself a professional was much higher. Not only did you need your camera gear, you also needed a fully kitted darkroom and to buy all your consumables film, chemicals, paper, etc.
So the difference between today and a quarter of a century ago was that these deluded fools remained "talented" (ahem) amateurs rather than going into (and rapidly out of) business as a pro.
There was still the curse of the appalling wedding photographer back then. There were "schools" that allowed you to take a correspondence course as a wedding photographer and gave you a nice certificate at the end of it. They also gave you help in setting up your business and promised you loads of business in your first year. All for a substantial fee of course. It wasn't very different from the schemes you come across in many other trades. I've met several people who comissioned one of these so called professionals over the years. And every one ended up out of pocket and without any good photographs of their wedding day. Unless of course there were friends at the wedding with some aptitude for photography.
pregnant woman + spot color = bad photo.