US Postal Service: Is Collapse Imminent?

For the past three years, Phillip Herr of the US Government Accountability Office was tasked by Congress to find out what's wrong with the US Postal Service.

He came to this conclusion (unsurprising to some, I'm sure):

Herr and his team concluded that the postal service's business model was so badly broken that collapse was imminent. Abandoning a long tradition of overdue reports, they felt they had to deliver theirs 18 months early in April 2010 to the various House and Senate committees and subcommittees that watch over the USPS. A year later, the situation is even grimmer. With the rise of e-mail and the decline of letters, mail volume is falling at a staggering rate, and the postal service's survival plan isn't reassuring. Elsewhere in the world, postal services are grappling with the same dilemma—only most of them, in humbling contrast, are thriving. [...]

The problems of the USPS are just as big. It relies on first-class mail to fund most of its operations, but first-class mail volume is steadily declining—in 2005 it fell below junk mail for the first time. This was a significant milestone. The USPS needs three pieces of junk mail to replace the profit of a vanished stamp-bearing letter.

Link


Shut em down except for saturday delivery. If they get rid of the junk mail, there wouldn't be much to deliver on Saturday anyway. waste of money no matter how you cut it. Purveyors of pure junk...
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Sobering article. It mentions but doesn't emphasize the deleterious impact that unions have had. 80% of the USPS budget goes to salaries and benefits. That's not leaving much for, you know, the actual workings of a postal system - buildings, vehicles, machinery, etc. Email has doomed them. FedEx and UPS will eclipse them. Good-bye, letter carrier.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
That is interesting that they say 80% of the budget goes to salary and benefits because I can tell you that isn't what the number I see tell me and trust me when I say they do not get more accurate then what I see.

I lot of the problem comes from the fact that there are just too many postal offices and that even though they have wanted to close some they get stopped, not by the unions but by congress because it seems nobody wants a post office to close in their district even if the union is ok with it.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
The Postal Service should not have to make money, it should be subsidized. We need to learn that not everything is a business, nor should be, nor follow business rules.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
When a nation's postal service fails the effect cascades through the chains of supply and credit. The result is similar to the decay of other infrastructure.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
the UK postal service is screwed too, for much the same reason. Certainly not thriving. Needs taking out the back and shooting through the head. CityLink and UPS are more than capable of delivering my online orders and for everything else there is email.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I wouldn't miss them, they don't even deliver to our houses in our town in the Rocky Mountains. We've got to get a PO box and go collect it in town. UPS and FedEx actually come to my house.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Fire Departments aren't making a profit, news at 11:00.

Water Treatment Plants unprofitable, public dazed.

I'm with bb, there comes a point where if you want civilization you have to pay for it.

Also, if you're really interested in the USPS' financial affairs read this: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20101013235408AA2vlzI
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Thirding the comment about the stupidity of trying to run it like a business. It's a SERVICE that improves people's lives. If this country was sane, we'd just run it at a loss and pay off the difference through taxes; making up the shortfall is the same as how many month's occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
80 percent labor costs...where did that number come from? I can't find it.

I work at UPS (union workers, by the way) and I think that the USPS is a great bargain...........think about it, you can send a letter ANYWHERE in the USA for 44 cents,. What a value. What else can you get for 44 cents now days? Their package rates are good too.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
They need to cut their delivery force in half, and change to Mon-Wed-Fri delivery for business, and Tues-Thurs-Sat for homes.

Nothing that goes by USPS these days will matter if it takes another day to get delivered.

Of course their unions will never let them reduce their staff (and the associated payroll, insurance, health, retirement, pensions) by 50%.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@Bill - the 80% cost is compensation and benefit, as found by the GAO (so non-partisan):

This report groups strategies and options that can be taken to address challenges in USPS’s business model by better aligning costs with revenues (see table on next page). USPS may be able to improve its financial viability if it takes more aggressive action to reduce costs, particularly compensation and benefit costs that comprise 80 percent of its total costs, as well as increasing revenues within its current authority. However, it is unlikely that such changes would fully resolve USPS’s financial problems, unless Congress also takes actions to address constraints and legal restrictions.

To be fair, the report didn't put the blame solely on the labor cost. It acknowledged that the postal service had other serious problems - some its own doing, some not. Any solution to the postal service's woes, however, will require cutting this astronomical cost down.

The full link to the report is here: Link

I agree fully with you that the postal service provides a great service and good value. Unlike other commenters, my overall experience with USPS is very positive.

I wish you guys the best of luck in fixing its problems (Our own NeatoShop is a big customer of the postal service).
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
anything that's primarily a service is going to have a high percentage of operational cost in labor/benefits. That is hardly surprising. How much of, say, a cleaning agencies budget goes to salaries?

I feel bad for the USPS; people want them to turn a profit but if they do things to help them do that--reduce delivery schedules (3 days a week would be fine in most cases), close some offices, etc, people get mad and the government gets involved.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"The rise of e-mail"? They only just figured that out?

Same here in Canada - once a week would be fine. Preferably the day before the recycle truck comes by.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I'm sorry, but if the post office cut their union out of the picture and paid these window workers the money they're worth (like other non-labor intensive unskilled workers) instead of what they unions think they should be making, they'd be making money in a year.

Most of the window workers are either morons or self-appointed tyrants, which is hilarious considering a teenager who works at McDonalds has enough skills to do their jobs.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 20 comments
Email This Post to a Friend
"US Postal Service: Is Collapse Imminent?"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More