Yeah ok, that makes sense. In my defense: I was asking questions (and explaining my motivations for the questions) and I did get an answer, so thx. :))
Some people are hard to please. I think glowing brakes and self-deflating tires are pretty neat, myself. I never really thought about the engineering concerns involved in stopping several hundred tons dead from a rate of 200 MPH.
The test is designed and supervised by the FAA. Boeing does conduct the test themselves (it's their airplane), but the have to satisfy the FAA's inspectors; otherwise the plane won't get certified.
Also, it's in Boeing's interest to do good testing. A plane isn't like a toaster - any time ONE has a problem, it makes the news immediately. Fleets get grounded, investigations get launched, customers get angry, money gets lost. It's much cheaper to do proper tests than release a plane with defects.
Not that Boeing doesn't do shady things - they absolutely do! But this isn't one of them :)
Yeah ok, that makes sense. In my defense: I was asking questions (and explaining my motivations for the questions) and I did get an answer, so thx. :))
The test is designed and supervised by the FAA. Boeing does conduct the test themselves (it's their airplane), but the have to satisfy the FAA's inspectors; otherwise the plane won't get certified.
Also, it's in Boeing's interest to do good testing. A plane isn't like a toaster - any time ONE has a problem, it makes the news immediately. Fleets get grounded, investigations get launched, customers get angry, money gets lost. It's much cheaper to do proper tests than release a plane with defects.
Not that Boeing doesn't do shady things - they absolutely do! But this isn't one of them :)
Tower: Next time just run the damn squirrel over.
But hey, if you are pushing some aviation agenda here, we need to get on top of it.
(Just kidding.)
(No I'm not!)