Michelle Curtis of New Zealand has a very prized cat for a pet. Her cat, Buddy, is Siamese-Bengal.
Buddy went missing for a few days. When he was returned Michelle was horrified to find out that neighbors had neutered poor Buddy. Apparently one neighbor trapped the cat and another neighbor paid to have the cat fixed. The neighbors claim that they thought the cat was a stray who went around beating up other neighborhood cats.
Sandra Conchie of the Bay of Plenty Times has more: Link
Photo: Bay of Plenty Times / Joel Ford
Buddy went missing for a few days. When he was returned Michelle was horrified to find out that neighbors had neutered poor Buddy. Apparently one neighbor trapped the cat and another neighbor paid to have the cat fixed. The neighbors claim that they thought the cat was a stray who went around beating up other neighborhood cats.
Ms Curtis, a former cat breeder, said she had owned Buddy for almost two years and until last weekend had intended using him as a stud cat.
Sandra Conchie of the Bay of Plenty Times has more: Link
Photo: Bay of Plenty Times / Joel Ford
Clearly, this was not a cat who was being groomed for stud. A cat can be injured, pick up diseases, or killed in an accident when wandering in this way. Anyone who has a vested interest in a cat would keep it confined for its own health, at the very least.
When I was being taught how to drive, I was told that a driver who accidentally hits and kills a dog is obliged to inquire about its owner in the vicinity, but there is no such obligation for a cat. This is because a cat will wander.
I have no sympathy.
If this cat was that important to her I would think she'd want to protect her investment by at least allowing others easy identification of her property. Be it a collar, tattoo in the ear, or RFID chip. Any one of those would have been found by SPCA staff, and this would be a story of a woman being fined for allowing her expensive cat to be an un-neutered stray. Why must everyone else bear the burden of her mistakes? If anything she should have to pay the SPCA and her neighbors back for the trouble she's caused.
If she didn't want anything to happen to him should've kept him indoors.
Here we just toss'm into the wood chipper. Quick, cheap, and not as noisy as you'd expect.
And frankly I don't agree with breeding cats, or any animal kept as a pet, because there are enough animals in shelters that need homes.
A similar story happened in the neighborhood I lived in shortly after graduating college- there was a friendly but 'intact' male cat known as Grey Tom around. My downstairs neighbors fed him sometimes, and eventually got a trap from the Humane Society, trapped him and had him neutered. Only then did they find out he had an 'owner' who was quite upset that they had inflicted such an ordeal on his darling cat.
On a more personal note our neighbours cat was coming round to our house and spraying all the time. In the end the neighbours cat's behaviour triggered one of our cats to start spraying :(
Please keep your kitties inside. Not only is it safer for your cat, your roaming cat can have unintended consquences for your neighbours!
No sympathy for the stupid owner, but I would wager the neighbours did NOT really think this cat was a stray.
I can honestly not believe that neighbors let a cat terrorize their neighborhood for a year without asking around as to whos cat it was. Obviously somebody owned it, as I cant see a stray hanging around one place for a year without somebody feeding it. It seems to me that the neighbors decided to be passive agressive about the whole thing instead of finding and confronting the owner. And dont tell me that that would have been too much work, I'm assuming it would have been easier than aquiring a trap and having it fixed. I bet they knew it was someones cat and had it fixed to teach the owner a lesson because they were too afraid of confrontation.