Does two wrong make a right? Perhaps not, but two fails do cancel each other out!
Cubiclebot has a video clip of a bicycle rider going the wrong way hitting a pedestrian who was jaywalking. Watch how two "fails" cancel each other out: Link
Does two wrong make a right? Perhaps not, but two fails do cancel each other out!
Cubiclebot has a video clip of a bicycle rider going the wrong way hitting a pedestrian who was jaywalking. Watch how two "fails" cancel each other out: Link
Instead, he has a full 3 seconds to maneuver around the guy (which is way easier to do on a bike, than in a car). But nope, he hits him, and tries to play it off as a no-fault situation.
Jaywalking was a much lesser offense. And frankly, the jaywalker, who was looking for traffic coming in the other direction, didn't steal someone else's right-of-way (because you don't have right-of-way when you're going the wrong direction).
1. The bike is supposed to follow the same rules of the road as automobiles. Hes going the wrong way on a one way street. A cop could give him a ticket far it. They could give a ticket to the walker too but there isn't a judge on the bench that would enforce the jay walking ticket. They would enforce the driving the wrong way on a one way street to the bike rider. Not because he was in the wrong but because he would be causing traffic problems.
2. Believe it or not. Courts consider Pedestrians as having the right of way weather they are using a marked cross walk or not.
The pedestrian may be dead if he were hit by a car but when someone sued the driver far wrongful death of the pedestrian. The car driver would in most cases lose the civil case and also be put up for manslaughter charges. Same could have happened if the pedestrian was hurt by the idiot riding the bike.
Only thing worse would have been if the idiot on the bike would have been riding on the sidewalk and hit the walker.