YouTube link.
This video purports to show a golf ball striking a steel plate at 150 mph, with the action filmed at 70,000 frames per second. At several YouTube postings of the same sequence, the discussion threads are dominated by incredulity, with opinions being presented that a real golf ball cannot deform to this degree, and that what is shown is another type of ball resembling a golf ball, or else pure computer graphics (or, as the YouTube crowd says, "photoshopping.") The discussion at Neatorama will presumably be more intelligent and well-informed. What do you think? A real regulation golf ball?
Via
within the crainium.
To put it another way: FAKE! FAKE! FAKE!
Also here's a pressure test on a golfball:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk_rZI9tOFc&feature=related
So...I won't go so far as to call it fake. What I will say is that at best, it is mis-titled. That cannot be a golf ball doing 150mph.
And hitting a unmovable object at 150mph is NOT the same as being hit by a driver going 120+mph (since in the latter, the ball is free to travel in the opposite direction).
I lean towards real.
I vote plausible.
Look at the flex of the steel plate.
It doesn't matter which one is stationary and which one is moving. In both cases, the ball is free to travel in the opposite direction.
Thinking back to physics momentum equations (I think this is right...)
Force x time(delta) = mass x velocity
If we assume the length of impact (time) is the same in both cases and the velocities are roughly equal. The force applied to the ball is proportional to the mass of the moving object. I'd assume that a driver has more mass than a golf ball. So, in reality, a driver swung Tiger should deform the ball more than a ball hitting a stationary wall.
i call fake.
I did a quick calculation though:
It takes about 20 frames for a ball radius to travel across the screen. If ball radius = 2.35cm (.0235m) then at 70,000 frames per second would put this ball at about 82 m/s which is approximately 180 mph.
This is super rough and the ball diameter information I found varies quite a bit. If anything it seems that the speed in the description is ballpark accurate.
"real" = 3
"doubt" = 5
"fake" = 6
other = 2
I don't have a definitive answer, but I suspect with enough digging and Googling, one could be found...
http://tinyurl.com/3y572oe
http://tinyurl.com/3xanr6j
For evidence, watch some other high speed collisions of objects you think are solid. Watch lead bullets liquify on iron plates, or arrows bend to perpendicular when loosed from a bow.
Have you actualy seen the bullet after the impact? Bounce back to it's original shape... it does not.
Shot out of an air-gun at super high speed against a steel plate? It's looking more and more plausible, the more I research it.
@ Colt Seaver:
you cant compare it to a bullet liquifying because they go a little faster than 150mph....
look at the other slo mo videos of golf balls being hit by drivers. theres also videos of golf balls being squashed by a pile driver. eg:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk_rZI9tOFc
Or at least.....misleading and bisexual.
FWIW, I think it's real, but I'll not cry if somebody proves otherwise. :)
http://www.golfballtest.org/?cat=1
I say it's a real squash ball, with dimples and painted in white.
I'm not a materials engineer but have studied the basics and feel fairly certain the the plastic used in the shell of the golf ball will experience 'plastic' deformation -- ie the material will not return to it's original shape after it's deformed. I'm also of the opinion that the plastic would be quite brittle and would fail before changing shape that much.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUzr-4W3imw&feature=fvw
I believe the 'cricket' logo is from one of the BBC digital channels - one would push the red button on their remote control to go to whatever match is playing at the time.
In other words, the video looks like it was ripped from a television broadcast. I realise that it doesn't help towards validating the video but it might trigger someone's memory of its context?
And as the cross-sections at the link in Christophe's comment show, there are golf balls with a structure that might be compressible to this degree.
Perhaps it's "real" but not "regulation" - one of the variants that Nate Greene suggests.
Definitive documentation/sourcing still pending...
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/912495/slow_motion_baseball_hit/
It's not conclusive, but I would say that a baseball feels more rigid than than a golf ball. Yet, you still see the same deformation; though, to a smaller degree, which is expected.
I can't authenticate this without further information, but it doesn't seem unreasonable..
I once cut a balata ball open with a hacksaw, I got about 1/4 inch in and the thing basically exploded. Rubber pieces everywhere.
I wanted it to be real. but was sure withing seconds it's some kind of novelty soft rubber ball or prank golf ball or something of the sort.
D U H !
It's real. The BBC did a show called "Invisible Worlds" and did a lot of extreme slo-mo stuff like this.
It's probably real. Things happen at ultra-high speeds that are counterintuitive - like the compression waves you see in this video. Someone noted a golfball will crack in a vise - and it will - but the situation is not the same, in that the vise is steady-state, while the golfball in the video is free to oscillate and turn that energy back into kinetic motion.
The way to confirm reality would be to simply reproduce the video; the one attempt I saw above still wasn't nearly fast enough to show anything. Calling the Mythbusters!
You obviously never put a balata golf ball in a vice, it deforms, it's made of rubber.
I might be wrong about the specific episode, but I'm pretty sure it's from the recently aired "Mythssion Contol."
Here is a paper on the topic: http://www.springerlink.com/content/936p5m7481450164/fulltext.pdf
The photos are of a golf ball hitting a steel plate at 136 mph, and the ball compresses although not nearly as much as on the video, or in the same jelly-like fashion.
My guess is that the video is real footage of an elastic golf ball, run through some digital processing to enhance the effect. Or it may be entirely genuine, but of a golf ball hitting a steel plate at a much higher speed than 150mph.
I'm pretty sure @xanderkale is correct saying it's from Invisible Worlds. That show included some incredible pictures of things not seen before because the high-speed cameras used were the very latest developments in camera technology.
And @sfraz, we use Imperial measurements in here in the UK unlike the rest of Europe, so it would be mph and not k/ph.
Thanks for answering my question- I'm now not entirely convinced that it's shopped :=]
First, the club is moving towards the ball and both will continue in the same direction. Here, the ball is moving towards an object that doesn't move so the energy has to reflect back through the ball.
Second, a golf club deforms as well as the ball in contact, here the steel doesn't, so the ball is absorbing most of the energy.
Third, even though a golf ball from Tiger achieves speeds in the 170 mph range, the club is only moving at about 120 mph (still very impressive speed).
All that being said, hard to say if it is real or not. I'd tend to believe it is, but could wouldn't bet the farm on it.
Bubba Watson: 122.81 mph
Dustin Johnson: 121.74
J.B. Holmes: 121.34
Tiger Woods, is tied for 10th at 118.84. Bubba Watson's 122.81 mph clubhead speed turns into an average ball speed of 181.28 mph. The highest he's been measured at is 188.19.
Dustin Johnson's average ball speed is 180.01, and J.B. Holmes' is 179.53. (Tiger: tied for 20th at 173.33.)