This is an ordinary Wednesday morning in April 2010 at around 8.30 am. Original time was 8 minutes that were compressed into 2 minutes, so everything is 4 times faster than in reality. The sound is original.
This is one of the busiest junctions in Utrecht a city with a population of 300,000. No less than 18,000 bicycles and 2,500 buses pass here every day. And yet Google Street View missed it. Because private motorized traffic is restricted here.
These cyclists cross a one way bus lane (also used by taxis and municipal vehicles), two light rail tracks and then a one way street that can be used by private vehicles.
Commentary at the link addresses the absence of helmets on the cyclists.
Via The High Definite.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roIeRZA5w54
And some guy who made observations about the different bikes:
http://www.ski-epic.com/amsterdam_bicycles/
Yes we like to bike :)
Very strange to see this, here in New Zealand approved helments are comulsory for bicycles and motorcycles alike.
I wonder what the accident rate is in the Netherlands where helmets would have been beneficial. Or perhaps the better bicycle infrastructure (looks like special roads) resolves that suitably.
Bike helmets have very debated efficacy. They aren't designed to stand up to anything more than a straight fall at 10mph or less.
You're more likely to sustain a head injury in your kitchen, or falling from a step-stool.
Most countries with mandatory helmet laws end up with the unintended consequence of reduced ridership, and with fewer cyclists come increased fatalities (decreased driver awareness of cyclists vs safety in numbers).
And in the end it's all rather silly. Cycling is safer than driving, even when you're not factoring in the health benefits. When you include the benefits, getting on your bike almost always increases your lifespan (provided you aren't riding recklessly, drunk, etc)
Hmmm. I wouldn't put money on that. Cyclists get bowled over by cars all the time here in NZ.
I suspect that it comes down to, as I said, infrastructure.
Looks like low numbers of cyclists, and driver at-fault accidents on 70km/hr+ roads are your biggest issues.
Unfortunately, helmets are practically useless for those kind of accidents, which explains why there's been no appreciable drop in fatalities since the '94 helmet law.
http://www.transport.govt.nz/research/Documents/Cyclist%20Crash%20Statistics%2009.pdf
One interesting point the statistics show, is that at slower speed car/bike accidents (like you would expect in an urban center like utrecht) have a 95% cyclist survival rate. But 70kph+ accidents have a near 0 survival rate.
Debate all you like, but when my head collided with the roof of a Honda Fit last September, I was glad for my helmet; and I know a helmet saved my dad's life in July of 2007 when a car backed in to him as he did 45 down a hill.
Is there any defensive cycling lesson you can take away from either of those accidents, that would help you prevent something similar from happening in the futur?
It was truly amazing! 55 years later and I still recall it. Every bicycle on the planet was there, and the huge mass of riders moved as smoothly as a choreographed Astaire/Rogers number.
@ andiscandis - At first I thought it was
like a sidecar on a motorcycle. Had to replay to
see it was another bike. He did a great job with it.
Being the romantic sort I am I'll believe he was going
to see his girlfriend.
(wasn't really every bike, but heck, I was 10 then)
Jimmeee the motorbike-rider you notice riding without a helmet, did that because it is a small moped with an engine block of max 49,9 cc's that legally is restricted to a speed of 25k.p/h.. They do not have to wear a helmet. For the faster category moped that legally can go upto 45 k.p/h. you are required to wear a helmet. The legally classified moped can ride the bicycle-lanes under certain circumstances. You can get a special drivers-license for a moped when you're 16 years old. Any faster motorcycle is not allowed to ride on bicycle-lanes, a certified helmet is compulsory and you need a motorcycle-license. You can get such a license from 18 years on just like a car-drivers license.
I myself commute in Rotterdam by bike, 20 km. per day (every day), takes me with my 'sweet cruiser style' bike about 30 minutes (10 km.)
You should look for pictures of parkinglots for bikes near large trainstations like Utrecht, Amsterdam, Rotterdam or smaller city's with universities like Delft or Leiden, unbelievable.
Also: helmets are mandatory on scooters, but there is a slower type (max 25 km/h) that does not require one.
Also: while ive never been to America, i think driver awareness is WAY higer here. EVRYONE has biked a lot at one point. And as a car driver your always wrong (by law). And of course there are a lot of bike lanes.
Also a helmet would mess up your hair, hard to carry around when shopping and just looks silly.
Also this crossing isn't even that crowded compared to for example Amsterdam, you should see the situation at the Central Station where there is a special bicycle parking boat behind the station and a multi storied parking garage just for bicycles in the front:
http://littlepicturesmusic.tumblr.com/post/234782350/dutch-word-of-the-month-club
Hills make things more difficult.
I spent 4 years in Bermuda which has a huge amount of tourists. They can rent 50cc mopeds which are a lot of fun. The thing is they drive on the left side of the road. Needless to say that can easily present all sorts of problems for American/Canadian tourists. The Bermudians were terrific at watching out for them and helping them out. It was great to see the car drivers taking care of the unknowing tourists. The fact that tourism accounts for almost all of the islands income may have had something to do with it. But I think it was more the friendly way of the Bermudians. As shown by the people of the Netherlands and Bermuda cars and bikes/mopeds can easily coexist.
Please email me at dcogswe1(at)jhu.edu or post here how to find you.